Table 3 Headcount ratios and relative contributions of each indicator to disempowerment
From: Emic definitions of empowerment for just development: learnings from Kenya
Uncensored headcount ratio | Decomposed contribution to disempowerment | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Women | Men | Women | Men | |
Intrinsic agency | ||||
Autonomy in income | 0.27 | 0.28 | 0.12 | 0.10 |
Self-efficacy | 0.25 | 0.23 | 0.12 | 0.10 |
Attitudes about intimate partner violence | 0.31 | 0.18 | 0.12 | 0.07 |
Instrumental agency | ||||
Input in productive decisions | 0.10 | 0.16 | 0.06 | 0.07 |
Ownership of land and other assets | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Access to and decisions on credit and financial accounts | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.03 |
Control over use of income | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.04 | 0.05 |
Work balance | 0.52 | 0.36 | 0.19 | 0.11 |
Visiting important locations | 0.22 | 0.25 | 0.11 | 0.12 |
Collective agency | ||||
Group membership | 0.08 | 0.28 | 0.06 | 0.16 |
Membership in influential groups | 0.22 | 0.37 | 0.13 | 0.19 |