From: Sustainable production through biostimulants under fruit orchards
Fruit crop | Biostimulants name | Doses or concentrations | Mode of application | Positive effects on the fruit trees | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Humic substances (Humic acid & Fulvic Acid) | |||||
Apricot | Actosol® (contains 2.9% humic acid) | Foliar spraying with 15 cm3 per tree and 75 cm3/3 L as a weekly soil addition | Both foliar as well as soil Application | •↑↑ the vegetative growth ( shoot length, chlorophyll content •↑↑most of yield determinations and fruit quality | Fathy et al. (2010) |
Pineapple | Humic acid + Vermicompost + Microbes | Soil Application | •↑↑ growth and adaptation of pineapple plantlets to the ex vitro environment | Baldotto et al. (2010) | |
Strawberry | Vermicompost leachates (Humic substances) | Foliar spray | •↑↑ fruit yield (10–14%) and •↓↓ incidence of grey mould | Singh et al. (2009) | |
Strawberry | Humic acids | Foliar spray and fertigation | •↑↑ nutrient use efficiency | Ameri et al. (2012) | |
Peach | Commercial humic acids | 5 cm3/tree three times | Both foliar as well assoil Application | •↑↑ fruit yield and quality | Mansour et al. (2013) |
Strawberry | HA commercial soluble product | – | foliar spray | •↑↑ yield (33%), fruit firmness and total soluble solid percent | Farahi et al. (2013) |
Yellow passion fruit | Humic acids | 7.5, 15.0, 22.5 and 30 ml/L | Foliar spray | •↑↑root dry weight by 124% in seedlings •Amoleriated seedling quality | Cavalcante et al. (2013) |
Lime | Humic acid | 4.5 ml/L | Soil Application | •↑↑ shoot fresh and dry weights, root dry weight and shoot potassium concentration | Jahromi and Hassanzadeh (2016) |
Strawberry | Humic acid + seaweed extract (1500 mg/L) | 400 mg/L + SWE 1500 mg/L | Both soil and foliar spray | •↑↑yield, and physico-chemical characteristics [total soluble solids and titratable acidity; amount of vitamin C (Ascorbic acid)] | Alkharpotly et al. (2017) |
Mango | Humic acids | 7.5 ml/L | Drenching | •↑↑ the plant height, leaf area, plant spread, girth at collar, root length, •number of secondary and tertiary roots, •↑↑dry matter production | Rajan et al. (2018) |
Kiwifruit | Humic acid | 4 ml/L | Both foliar and Drenching | •↑↑yield, and physico-chemical characteristics [total soluble solids and titratable acidity; amount of vitamin C (Ascorbic acid)] | Hadi et al. (2018) |
Strawberry | Nitrogen and humic acid | 100 kg ha−1 and 4 kg ha−1, respectively | Soil application and foliar | •highest values for the leaf area, fruit yield, •chlorophyll a, carotenoids and titratable acidity are associated with the combined treatments of with concentrations of | Rostami et al. (2022) |
Olive | Arginine + humic acid | – | Foliar | •↑↑ fruit protein content and total chlorophyll | Nargesi et al. (2022) |
2. Phosphites | |||||
Banana | Phosphorous acid | (50% P as HPO42− and 50% as H2PO3− | Nutrient solution in hydroponics | •↑↑ Biomass dry weight, foliar area and P content in the whole plant | Bertsch et al. (2009) |
Strawberry | Phosphoric acid (Liquid NPK 3:12:15 fertilizer Phosfik1) | 0.3% liquid NP | Plants soaked and irrigated | •↑↑ fruit acidity, ascorbic acid and anthocyanin content | Moor et al. (2009) |
Strawberry | Potassium phosphite | 6.7% of total P as Phi | Root application through a controlled watering system | •↑↑ roots growth and shoots | Glinicki et al. (2010) |
Strawberry | Phosphoric acid | 30% of total P as Phi | Nutrient solution applied to the roots | •↑↑ chlorophyll, amino acids and proteins contents in leaves | Ortiz et al. (2011) |
Strawberry | Phosphorous acid | (20% of total P as Phi) | Nutrient solution applied to the roots | •↑↑ sugar concentration and firmness of fruits; improves shelf life | Ortiz et al. (2012) |
Grapes | Potassium phosphite | 5.0 g L−1 of P2O5 | Foliar spray | •↑↑ productivity, total soluble phenolic compounds; •↑↑ total soluble solids and pH, •↓↓ total titratable acidity of the berries | Pereira et al. (2012) |
Strawberry | Phosphorous acid | (20–30% of total P as Phi) | Nutrient solution applied to the roots | •↑↑ acidity, sugars, ions concentration and anthocyanin concentration in fruits | Ortiz et al. (2013) |
3. Seaweed extracts | |||||
Mango | Seaweed extract | 0.2% Seaweeds | Foliar spray | •↑↑ fruit yield producing large sized fruits with superior quality | Mohamed and El-Sehrawy (2013) |
Peach | Seaweed extract | 4 ml.L−1 | Foliar spray | •↑↑ total leaves area, leaf chlorophyll content; leaf carbohydrates, leaf nitrogen content and leaf zinc content | Al-Rawi et al. (2016) |
Date palm | Sea weed extact + postassium nitrate | Seaweed extracts and KNO3 at 2% | Foliar spray | •↑↑ bunch weight, fruit yield, fruit and flesh weight •↑↑soluble solids content, sugars content and fruit moisture | Omar et al. (2017) |
Mulberry | seaweed extract from A. nodosum | 0.5 ml/L at 21, 28 and 35 days | Foliar spray | •↑↑ leaf yield per plant and protein content | Pappachan et al. (2017) |
Banana | Seaweed (A. nodosum L.) | 2 g/L | Foliar spray | •↑↑bunch weight and yield, | El-Kholy (2017) |
Olive | Sea weed extract | 6 ml/L | Foliar spray | •↑↑ leaf area, leaves chlorophyll content, leaves dry weight and leaves carbohydrates content | Al-Hadethi (2019) |
Grapevine | Seaweed (A. nodosum L.) | 1 g/Lt | Foliar spray | •↑↑ yield and no. of berries •↑↑ anthocyanin content | Taskos et al. (2019) |
Sour orange | Sea weed extact + CPPU | SWE (Agazone algae extract @ 9 ml/L + CPPU@ 8 mg/ L−1) | Foliar spray | •↑↑ seedling height, number of leaves, area of leaves and increase plant stem diameter rate | Ali and Al-Araji (2020) |
Strawberry | Seaweed extracts (Alga 600) | 4, g/L-1 | Fertigation | •↑↑ number of flowers per plant, yielding units/plant •↑↑ in fruit quality like TSS, sugar acids ratio | Al-Shatri et al. (2020) |
Mango seedling | Seaweed extract | 4 ml/L | Foliar Spray | •↑↑ leaf nitrogen content, leaf potassium, leaf iron and leaf zinc content | Al-Marsoumi and Al-Hadethi (2020) |
Grapes | seaweed extract | 2 g/L | Foliar spray | •↑↑ yield and berry attributes •↑↑amino acid content and Vitamins improved vine C/N ratio, | El-Sese et al. 2020 |
4. Protein hydrolysates | |||||
Strawberry | Animal derived PH (Aminoflor) | 5 L/ha | Foliar spray | •↑↑ dry matter and nitrate content of leaves •↓↓ weight of daughter plants | Lisiecka et al. (2011) |
Banana | Chicken feather derived PH | 10 g/ L | Soil and foliar | •↑↑ nutrient, chlorophyll content, and proline in leaves •↑↑ sugars, proteins, amino acids, phenolics and flavonoids in fruits | Gurav and Jadhav (2013) |
Pecannut | Protein hydrolysate Supramino + urea + boric acid + zinc sulphate | 5 ml/L supramino + 0.5% urea + 0.1% boric acid + 0.5% zinc sulphate | Foliar spray | •↑↑ nut weight, kernel weight/length/breadth; fruit size and weight; kernel protein content •↑↑ Zn, Fe, Mn, Cu foliar contents | Ashraf et al. (2013) |
Persimmon | Protein hydrolysate + calcium salts | 5 L/ha, every 8 days, 7 times in 2012 and 23 L ha − 1, every 6 days, 24 times in 2013 | Drenching and injection | •↓↓ Cl− uptake, leaf necrosis, and leaf water potential | Visconti et al. (2015) |
Strawberry | Amino-acids of animal origin | 5, 1.0 and 1.5 g per plant | Four drench applications | •↑↑ resistance to frost damages | Bogunovic et al. (2015) |
Date palm | Coconut Milk + Casein Hydrolysate | Coconut Milk 30% and Casein Hydrolysate 2.5 g/L | Foliar spray | •↑↑ chlorophyll content, total carbohydrate, protein, amino acid, phenol and indole | Hosny et al. (2016) |
Grapevine | Protein hydrolysates (PHs) | 1.6 and 6.4 g/L | Foliar spray | •↑↑ yield per vines •↑↑ qualitative parameter like anthocyanin content colour shape, phenolic content, TSS | Boselli et al. (2019) |
5. Chitosan | |||||
Dragon fruit | Chitosan from crab shell | 50 kDa, 75–85% DD encapsulated as droplets of 200, 600 and 1000 nm diameter | Fruit dipping in post-harvest | •↑↑ fruit firmness and titratable acidity, total phenolics, flavonoids, lycopene and antioxidants, d •↓↓ weight loss and respiration rate | Ali et al. (2013) |
Peach | Chitosan + oligochitosan | Chitosan and oligochitosan @ 0.5 and 5.0 g/L | Foliar spray | •↓↓ post-harvest losses by delaying fruit softening & promotes antioxidant and | Ma et al. (2013) |
Kiwifruit | Chitosan | Chitosan (∼85% DD, MW = 20–30 kDa) applied at 1.0 kg/ha | Foliar spray | •↑↑ fruit fresh weight and yield, •↓↓ the incidence of disease | Scortichini (2014) |
White and red prickly pears | Medium-MW chitosan | Medium-MW chitosan (85% DD) at 1% (w/v) in 0.6% (v/v) | Fruit dipping (peeled) in post-harvest | •↓↓ weight loss, • = firmness and colour •↑↑Improved the sensory values | Ochoa and Guerrero-Beltrán (2014) |
Citrus | Neem + kurtuma leaf extract | 30% neem and kurtuma leaf extract | Foliar application | •↓↓ infestation of citrus leaf-miner | Shareef et al. (2016) |
Grapevines | Chitosan + Salicylic acid + Fulvic acid | 500 mg/L | Foliar Spray | •↑↑ shoot length, leaf area, •↑↑total chlorophyll and total protein, •↑↑yield per vine, cluster weight, berry weight, soluble solids content •↑↑ total phenols while reducing total acidity, cluster weight loss%,berry shatter % and berry decay% •↓↓loss in cluster weight percentages during storage shelf life period | El-Kenawy (2017) |
Mango | Nano-chitosan | Nano-chitosan 5 ml/L | Foliar Spray | •↑↑ fruits yield as number of fruit or weight/tree •↓↓ malformation percentage | Zagzog et al. 2017 |
Washington Navel Orange | Chitosan | 2 g/L | Foliar spray | •↑↑ leafy inflorescence •↑↑ fruit set % and Canopy yield as weight (kg/m3) •↑↑ chlorophyll contents •↑↑physico-chemical properties of fruit | Mohamed and Ahmed 2019 |
Pomegranate | Chitosan | chitosan at 0.5% | Foliar spray | •↑↑ improved the yield and fruit quality comparing •↓↓ the fruit cracking | Ibtesam et al. (2019) |
Cherry | Chitosan coatings | 2% | Dipping | •↑↑firmness •↓↓ reduced the expression of pectin methylesterase-related genes | Xin et al. (2020) |
6. Botanicals | |||||
Citrus | Neem + kurtuma leaf extract | 30% neem and kurtuma leaf extract | foliar application | •↓↓ infestation of citrus leaf-miner | Shareef et al. (2016) |
Cherry | Wildflower strips | height of 20 cm with regular cutting | •↓↓ aphids (bait cards) in by 25% | Mateos et al. (2021) | |
7. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AM Fungi) | |||||
Grapevines | Arbuscular-mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) | 20 g of mycorrhizal inoculum per plant | Soil application | •↑↑chlorophyll, carotenoids, proline, phenol | Krishna et al. (2005) |
Tangerine orange | AMF (Glomus versiforme) | 30 g innoculum per pot | Soil application | •↑↑ leaf water potential, transpiration rates, photosynthetic rate, stomatal, conductance, relative water content and reduced leaf temperature | Wu and Xia (2006) |
Citrus | Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi | – | Soil application | •↑↑ plant height, stem diameter, shoot, root and total plant biomass, photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate and stomatal conductance | Wu et al. (2010) |
Loquat | AMF (Funneliformis mosseae) | 300 g of mycorrhizal inoculum per plant | Soil application | •↑↑ dry biomass and leaf water potential, | |
Kiwifruit | ,Glomus mosseae(G.m)and G.versiforme(G.v) | 5 g of inoculum | Soil application | •↑↑ absorption of N,P and K nutrients •↑↑ photosynthetic activity | Chen and Zeng 2016 |
Strawberry | Claroideoglomus aff. luteum, C. claroideum, C. etunicatum, Funneliformis mosseae and Glomus sp | – | Soil application | •↑↑ root system and fruit anthocyanin content | Chiomento et al. (2019) |
Newhall navel orange | Diversispora spurca and D. versiformis | Soil application | •↑↑ Root fungal colonization •↑↑increased soil phosphatases, and aggregate stability •↑↑ fruit quality and mineral element contents | Cheng et al. (2022) | |
9. Beneficial bacteria | |||||
Sour cherry | Bacillus mycoides T8 + Bacillus subtilis OSU-142 | OSU-142 | Floral and foliar | •↑↑ shoot length and fruit yield | Arikan and Pirlak (2016) |
Quince | Pseudomonas fluorescens) and (Rhodococcus rhodochrous) | PGPR + NPK and PGPR + 1/2 NPK | Soil combination | •↑↑ average flesh firmness, values andyield | Gerçekcİoğlu et al. (2018) |
Strawberry | Bacillus licheniformis CKA 1+ Root dip method + Foliar application | 109 cfu/ ml | Root + foliar application | •↑↑ growth and yield •↑↑ fruit quality like TSS compared to | Kumari et al. (2018) |