From: An interdisciplinary method for assessing IPM potential: case study in Scottish spring barley
Disease rating (1–9) | 2015 | 2014 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Powdery mildew | Scald** | RLS | Powdery mildew | Scald | RLS | |
3 | Â | Â | Â | Â | 41% | Â |
4 | Â | 83% | Â | Â | 39% | Â |
5 | Â | Â | Â | 14% | Â | 14% |
6 | 9% | 17% | 71% | Â | Â | 51% |
7 | Â | Â | Â | Â | 20% | 36% |
8 | 6% | Â | 29% | 44% | Â | Â |
9 | 86% | Â | Â | 42% | Â | Â |
AAC: Highly resistant*** | 92% | 0% | 29% | 86% | 20% | 36% |
AAC: Below Best choice**** | 15% | 83% | 0% | 58% | 80% | 65% |
Survey: Highly resistant | Â | Â | Â | 90% | 31% | 22% |
Survey: Below best choice | Â | Â | Â | 68% | 69% | 78% |
 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Disease rating (1–9) | Powdery mildew | Scald | RLS | Powdery mildew | Scald | RLS | Powdery mildew | Scald |
3 | Â | 37% | Â | Â | 23% | Â | Â | 19% |
4 | Â | 41% | Â | Â | 72% | Â | 1% | 66% |
5 | 13% | Â | 14% | 21% | Â | 75% | 23% | 1% |
6 | Â | 4% | 51% | Â | Â | 26% | Â | Â |
7 | Â | 18% | 34% | Â | 2% | Â | 3% | 9% |
8 | 55% | Â | Â | 53% | 2% | Â | 44% | 6% |
9 | 32% | Â | Â | 26% | Â | Â | 29% | Â |
AAC: Highly resistant | 87% | 18% | 34% | 79% | 4% | 0% | 76% | 15% |
AAC: Below Best choice | 68% | 82% | 65% | 74% | 97% | 75% | 71% | 95% |
Survey: Highly resistant | 90% | 23% | 23% | 76% | 18% | 9% | 70% | 28% |
Survey: Below best choice | 75% | 77% | 77% | 76% | 90% | 5% | 78% | 100% |
 | 2010 | 2009 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Disease rating (1–9) | Powdery mildew | Scald | Powdery mildew | Scald |
3 | Â | 8% | Â | 8% |
4 | Â | 61% | Â | 38% |
5 | 47% | Â | 41% | 12% |
6 | Â | 7% | Â | 10% |
7 | 14% | 17% | 26% | 26% |
8 | 14% | 7% | 9% | 6% |
9 | 25% | Â | 24% | Â |
AAC: Highly resistant | 53% | 24% | 59% | 32% |
AAC: Below best choice | 75% | 93% | 76% | 94% |