Skip to main content

Table 3 Effect of cropping systems and nutrient sources on production and land-use efficiency in direct-seeded basmati rice-based cropping systems

From: Bio-energy auditing, system productivity, energy efficiencies and economics of different direct-seeded basmati rice-based cropping systems and nutrient management options

Treatment

Production efficiency (kg REY/ha/day)

Production efficiency (US$/ha/day)

Land use efficiency (%)

2014‒2015

2015‒2016

Pooled

2014‒2015

2015‒2016

Pooled

2014‒2015

2015‒2016

Pooled

Cropping systems

 DSBR-wheat

23.2b

24.0c

23.6c

6.6c

6.5c

6.6c

68.2

68.0

68.1c

 DSBR-wheat-greengram

22.1cb

23.7dc

22.9c

6.0dc

6.3dc

6.2dc

84.9

84.4

84.7a

 DSBR-cabbage-greengram

53.6a

55.2b

54.4b

14.6b

15.1b

14.9b

66.0

65.8

65.9d

 DSBR-cabbage-onion

69.1a

66.5a

67.8a

18.8a

18.9a

18.9a

83.6

83.6

83.6b

Nutrient management strategies

 Control

25.8b

25.7b

25.8b

6.7d

6.6c

6.6d

75.7

75.4

75.6a

 100% RDF through fertilizers

47.5a

47.7a

47.6a

14.4a

14.6a

14.5a

75.7

75.4

75.6a

 50% RDF + 25%  RDN-LC + Bio

46.2a

47.1a

46.7a

12.0cb

12.5b

12.2cb

75.7

75.4

75.6a

 50% RDF + 25% RDN-VC + Bio

48.7a

48.8a

48.8a

13.1b

13.2ab

13.1b

75.7

75.4

75.6a

  1. Data represent mean values (n = 3) within a column followed by means with the same letter are not significantly different (P < 0.05) according to Tukey’s Studentized Range test
  2. DSBR, Direct-seeded basmati rice; RDF, Recommended dose of fertilizers; RDN, Recommended dose of nitrogen; LC, Leaf compost; VC, Vermicompost; Bio, Biofertilizers