Skip to main content

Table 6 Effect of FAW on maize productivity

From: Economic impacts and management of fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) in smallholder agriculture: a panel data analysis for Ghana

 

ln[Maize yield (kg/ha)]

ln[Maize income (GHC/ha)]

 

Pooled OLS

FEb

CRE

Pooled OLS

FE

CRE

Fall armyworma

− 0.116

− 0.053

− 0.148

− 0.859

− 0.470

− 0.788

 

(0.081)

(0.125)

(0.163)

(0.680)

(0.587)

(0.673)

Control variables included

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Region fixed effects

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Mean of time varying variables included

No

No

Yes

No

No

Yes

R-squared

0.3092

0.0076

0.3312

0.1413

0.0087

0.1564

F / Wald chi2

13.00***

2.75***

314.65***

5.78***

2.09**

149.28***

Hausman test chi2b

 

26.65*

  

24.74*

 

F test that all u_i = 0c

 

1.92***

  

1.38***

 

Observations

740

740

740

740

740

740

  1. Values in parentheses are robust standard errors
  2. The full regression results are presented in Additional file 1: Table S1
  3. aComparison group is no FAW infestation
  4. bHausman test of fixed versus random effects specification
  5. cThe statistically significant F test means that panel data models (rather than pooled OLS) are appropriate for our data
  6. *p < 0.1
  7. ** p < 0.05
  8. ***p < 0.01