Skip to main content

Nutrients in finger millet and soil at different elevation gradients in Central Nepal

Abstract

Background

Finger millet, a subsistence food crop, is a unique cereal with high nutritional quality particularly in hilly regions in Nepal. Hence, grain nutrients (protein, calcium, and iron percent) of ten different landraces of finger millet and soil quality (SOC, N, P and K) at different altitudes in central Nepal were analyzed.

Methods

Triplicate finger millet grain samples were collected from ten local landraces cultivated in randomized complete block design (RCBD) experiments at three different elevations (365 m, 1040 m and 1856 m) under the farmer management system for 2 years 2016 and 2017. Similarly, triplicate soil samples were collected from each experiment plot of different elevation. Kjeldahl method was used to determine grain protein and atomic absorption spectrophotometry method was used to determine calcium and iron. Soil nitrogen (N) was estimated by Kjeldahl method, the available phosphorous (P) by a modified Olsen’s method, potassium by Hanway and Heidel method and pH by using digital pH meter.

Results

The protein calcium and iron content in finger millet grain was significantly different (P < 0.05) among the local landraces and elevation levels. In all landraces of finger millet, the grain protein, calcium and iron content was found to increase along the increasing altitude. An average increase of 3.13% protein was found when altitude increased from 365 to 1856 m. However, only 2.04% and 1.09% of average grain protein increased as elevation increased from 365 m to 1040 m and 1040 m to 1856 m, respectively. The average Ca content increased by 0.47% when altitude increased from 365 to 1856 m. Similarly, the average Ca increased by 0.21% and by 0.26% as altitude increased from 365 m to 1040 m, and 1040 m to 1856 m, respectively and an average 0.33% Fe increase was found from 365 to 1856 m altitude. An increase of 0.11% and 0.21% of Fe was found from 365 to 1040 m and from 1040 to 1856 m, respectively. Soils at all experimental sites were acidic. The SOC, P, K of soil also increased with increasing altitude.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated the relationship among nutrients in finger millet (proteins, Ca and Fe), soil components (SOC, N, P and K), and altitudes, with respect to ambient climate. The grain nutrients (Nitrogen, Ca and Fe) of finger millet at higher altitudes were found higher than lower altitudes. Similarly, the temperature and grain nutrients showed strong negative correlation with growing season temperature. This study reveals relations of finger millet nutrients with climatic and soil conditions which are crucial to design the promotion policies of nutrient rich local crops in Nepal.

Background

Developing countries, particularly in Asia and Africa, experience major food deprivation (Vetriventhan and Upadhyaya 2019) and nutrition insecurity (Kumssa et al. 2015). Three main cereals—rice (Oryza sativa L.), wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and maize (Zea mays L.)]—play a major role in human energy intake (Cakmak and Kutman 2018)and food security (Ceasar et al. 2018); however, crops like finger millet have nutritional properties superior to these crops that can boost nutritional security (Puranik et al. 2017) in developing countries like Nepal. Africa and Asia produce about 55% and 42%, respectively, of the world’s finger millet (Bhagavatula et al. 2013). Finger millet is the fourth most important cereal crop in Nepal after rice, wheat, and maize in terms of area and production (MOAD 2017). In 2017, there was a deficit of about 71,400 tons of food in 23 hilly and mountain districts of Nepal where finger millet, barley, and buckwheat crops are grown under rain-fed conditions (MALMC 2018). These districts are vulnerable to food and nutritional insecurity, which may increase due to climate change. Climate change is a global phenomenon; however, Nepal is experiencing higher rates in comparison to global average temperature rise in the mountains (Shrestha et al. 2012). It is well known that an increase in temperature is a threat to human nutrition and food production (Myers et al. 2017; Smith and Myers 2018).

The finger millet grain is rich in protein, calcium, dietary fiber, and minerals (FAO 1991; Mbithi et al. 2000; Obilana and Manyasa 2002; FAO 2005; Dayakar et al. 2016; Wafula et al. 2018), playing crucial role of providing food and nutrition in its growing regions (Saleh et al. 2013). Finger millet grain contains higher calcium (Ca) [0.34%] (Gupta et al. 2017; Ceasar et al. 2018), iron (Fe) (Kumar et al. 2016) and protein (Sharma et al. 2017) than other major food crops such as rice, wheat and maize. Different literatures revealed the nutritional value of finger millet growing in India (Arjun et al. 2014; Upadhyaya et al. 2011; Singh and Srivastava 2006), Ethiopia (Admassu et al. 2009), and in Kenya (Wafula et al. 2018); however, to our knowledge, no nutritional analysis has been done on finger millet landraces along the elevation gradient in Nepal. Under these scenarios, it was important to determine the nutrient qualities of local landraces of finger millet at different altitudes in the context of local climate and soil conditions.

Methods and materials

Study area

The study area is located in Chitwan Annapurna Landscape (CHAL), Central Nepal, between 27˚35′ and 29˚33′ N latitude and 82˚88′ and 85°80′ E longitude, covering an area of 32,057 km2, with an elevation ranging from 200 to 8091 m. CHAL includes all or part of 19 districts (Mustang, Manang, Gorkha, Rasuwa, Nuwakot, Dhading, Lamjung, Tanahu, Syangja, Kaski, Palpa, Parbat, Baglung, Myagdi, Gulmi, Arghkhachi, Makwanpur, Chitwan and Nawalparasi) (Fig. 1), which covers about 22% land area of Nepal (MoFSC 2015). The area is a traditional subsistence-based agricultural system integrated with crops, livestock, and fodder trees as the main agro-ecological features. The major crops in the mountains and mid-hill parts of the regions are maize, wheat, finger millet, barley, and buckwheat, whereas in the inner Terai regions, rice, maize, wheat, finger millet, and potatoes are cultivated.

Fig. 1
figure1

Study area in Nepal

A wide range of climatic conditions occur in CHAL. It ranges from a subtropical humid climate in the lowlands (Chitwan and Nawalparasi districts) to alpine conditions in the high mountains, including a cold, dry climate in the trans-Himalayan parts of Manang and Mustang districts. The average minimum and maximum temperatures in CHAL vary according to altitude. The mean temperature of Siwalik [lower tropical climatic region (LTCR)] is more than 25 °C, followed by 20 °C in the middle hills [lower subtropical climatic region (LSTCR), and between 10 and 20 °C in the high mountains [upper subtropical climatic region (USTCR)] (MoE 2011) (Table 1). The average annual rainfall ranges from 165 mm at Lomanthang (Mustang) in the northern part of CHAL to 5244 mm at Lumle (highest rainfall in the mid-hills) located near Pokhara, Kaski (DHM 2017). Orographic effects cause high spatial variation in precipitation across the landscape. The overall climate of different regions of CHAL is presented in Table 1.

Table 1 Climatic conditions of experimental sites in CHAL

Nutrient analysis

Ten local landraces of finger millet [KLE-236, KLE-158, KLE-158, ACC#433-1, NE-1703-34, Dolakha local, Okhale-1, Kabre-1, Kabre-1, Kabre-2, Dalle-1] were collected from Hill Crop Research Stations (HCRS) (Kavre, Dolakha) for cultivation in farms at three different altitudes in CHAL [Sankhadev Nawalparasi (365 m), Dumrebhanjyang, (1040 m) and Kokhe (1856 m)] of Syangja districts falling in two ecological regions [lower tropical climatic region (LTCR) and upper tropical to sub-tropical climatic region (UTSCR)] (Fig. 2). The experiment was laid out in RCBD on 10 landraces (treatments) with three replications (blocks) for 2 years in 2016 and 2017.

Fig. 2
figure2

Experimental site in CHAL where finger millet was grown

Triplicate grain samples of each local landraces were collected in each year for analysis of nutrient quality from three elevation levels and these samples were used to analyze their nutrient quality in the laboratory. The laboratory analysis was done at the Agricultural Technological Centre (ATC), Lalitpur.

The nitrogen content was determined by Kjeldahl method as prescribed by Horneck and Miller (1988). The protein content of grain was calculated by multiplying nitrogen percent by Johns factors 6.25 (Kjeldahl determination). Iron, Potassium, and Calcium content were analyzed by using atomic absorption spectrophotometry method described in Hilu and Barbeau (1993).

Soil analysis

Sample collection and analysis

Triplicate composite soil samples (a single sample constitutes the mixture of soil from all 10 individual plots within block) were collected from the plough layer surface (0–15 cm) for the purpose of quantifying soil chemical properties. The soil samples were collected just before the transplantation of finger millet seedlings. The samples were properly air dried and kept in zipper plastic bags with proper labelling and brought to Ecology Laboratory-Central Department of Botany, Tribhuvan University. The soil chemical analyses were done in the Laboratory of Forests Research and Training Centre (FRTC), Babar Mahal, under the Ministry of Forests and Environment. The pH, soil organic carbon, total nitrogen, available phosphorus and potassium were analyzed by following the methods prescribed in Zobel et al. (1987).

Soil organic carbon (SOC) was determined by following Walkley and Black (1934), total nitrogen (N) was estimated by Kjeldahl method (Bremner and Mulvaney 1982), the available phosphorous (P) was determined by a modified Olsen’s method (Olson and Sommers 1982), potassium by Hanway and Heidel method (Hanway and Heidel 1952), and pH using a digital pH meter with 1:1 soil water ratio (McLean et al. 1982).

Statistical analysis

The descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, standard errors) of data were computed through Microsoft excel 2010. The Shapiro–Wilk normality test was applied to test normality of data. The grain nutrients (Protein, Calcium and iron) and soil components data showed the normal distribution. The parametric test—ANOVA was used to examine whether there was significant difference in nutrients at 5% level of significance according to altitude in R package version 3.4.4 (R Core Team 2013).

Results

Protein

The protein content in finger millet grain was significantly different (P < 0.05) among the local landraces and elevation levels. In all landraces of finger millet, the grain protein content was found to increase along the increasing altitude. The highest protein content (9%) was found on Okhale-1 at 365 m followed by Dalle-1, Dolakha local, ACC#433-1, NE 1703-34, Kabre-2, Kabre-1, GPU-0025, KLE-158, and KLE 236 with the least at 6.31%. Thus, range of protein was between 6.31 and 9%. At 1040 m altitude, the range of protein was between 8.19 and 11% having highest grain content on Dolakha local (11%) and least on KLE-236 (8.19%). However, at 1856 m altitudes, the range grain protein was between 10.31 and 13.06% with highest on Dolakha local (13.06%) and least on five local landraces (KLE-236, GPU-0025, ACC#433-1, NE1703-34 and Kabre-1) (Fig. 3). The grain protein among local landraces showed great variation but successively increases the grain nutrient percent as elevation increases.

Fig. 3
figure3

Protein content in different landraces of finger millet at three elevation sites in CHAL

The average grain protein of 2.04% and 1.09% increased as elevation from 365 m to 1040 m and 1040 m to 1856 m, respectively (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure4

Average grain protein content along three elevation sites in CHAL

Calcium

The calcium (Ca) content of finger millet grain significantly varied (P < 0.05) among the local landraces at different altitudes. In all landraces, a similar increasing trend of calcium in grains was found at different altitudes. At altitude 365 m, the maximum Ca was found in KLE158 (0.99%) and the least in KLE-236 0.55% landraces. Similarly, at 1040 m, the range of Ca was found between 0.92% in KLE-236 and 1.23% in landrace Kabre-2. The highest Ca was found in Dolakha local (2.08%) at 1856 m altitude and least on Kabre-1 (1.08%) (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure5

Calcium content in different landraces of finger millet at different elevation in CHAL

Among ten local landraces, the average Ca content increased by 0.47% when altitude increased from 365 to 1856 m. Similarly, the average Ca increased by 0.21% and by 0.26% as altitude increased from 365 m to 1040 m, and 1040 m to 1856 m, respectively (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6
figure6

Average calcium content in finger millet at different altitudes in CHAL

Iron

The iron (Fe) content in finger millet grain significantly (P < 0.05) varied in different landraces at different elevation levels. A similar trend in iron content was observed in finger millet increasing at higher altitude (Fig. 7). An average 0.33% Fe increase was found from 365 to 1856 m altitude. An increase of 0.11% and 0.21% of Fe was found from 365 to 1040 m and from 1040 to 1856 m, respectively, (Fig. 8).

Fig. 7
figure7

Iron content in different landraces of finger millet at different altitudes in CHAL

Fig. 8
figure8

Average iron content in finger millet at different altitudes in CHAL

Soil chemical properties

Soils at all experimental sites were acidic. The acidic nature of soil also increased with increasing altitude. The average soil pH was 6.1 ± 0.05, 6.0 ± 0.2, and 5.65 ± 0.05, respectively, at 365 m asl, 1040 m, and 1856 m altitudes (Table 2). Elevation wise, analysis of soil organic carbon (SOC), nitrogen (N), available phosphorus (P), and exchangeable potassium (K) is also presented in Table 2. The soil organic carbon percent was highest (4.03%) at 1856 m altitude.

Table 2 Variation on soil chemical properties of finger millet field along altitudes gradient

Nitrogen and available phosphorus content in soil samples had a specific pattern, i.e., as elevation increased, the soil components also increased at 127.57 ± 23.02, 170.32 ± 4.25, and 321.76 ± 12.81 ppm nitrogen, and 5.63 ± 0.28, 12.71 ± 0.28, and 30.14 ± 69 at 365 m, 1040 m, and 1856 m altitudes, respectively. The exchangeable potassium was also found highest (291.29 ± 5.75) at 1856 m (Table 2).

Discussion

Protein

Protein is the second most important component after carbohydrates in the grains of finger millet. Different literature indicates nearly 7% protein content in grains of finger millet; however, variation from 5.6 to 12.7% exists (Arjun et al. 2014). Singh and Srivastava (2006) analyzed 16 varieties of finger millet and found that grain protein ranged from 4.88 to 15.58%, with a mean value of 9.72%. Similarly, Vadivoo et al. (1998) analyzed 36 genotypes of finger millet and found that it ranged from 6.7 to 12.3% with a mean of 9.7%. Bachar et al. (2013) reported that finger millet has nearly 7% protein, while others reported 11% grain protein in finger millet (Amadou et al. 2013). Chethan and Malleshi (2007) reported that finger millet contains about 5–8% protein. The proximate protein composition of ten cultivars (two wild and eight originated in different areas of the world) were analyzed by Barbeau and Hilu (1993), reporting that the grain protein ranged from 7.5 to 11.7%. Similarly, from a study of different local landraces of finger millet in Ethiopia, the grain protein content of finger millet was found to be between 6.26 and 10.5% (Admassu et al. 2009). Chandra and Chandra (2016) mentioned in a literature review that the protein content in finger millet is 8.3%. All of these findings indicate that the range of protein among local landraces varies significantly, which is consistent with this study. However, the grain protein variation along the elevation gradient had not been analyzed in Nepal or elsewhere. In the case of Central Nepal, grain protein among ten landraces showed a very clear pattern that elevation increase has a strong positive correlation with protein content (Table 3). The average (of the 10 local landraces) protein content of finger millet grain at 365 m, 1040 m, and 1856 m was found to be 7.31%, 9.7%, and 10.8%, respectively. Among the studied landraces, Dolakha local at 1856 m elevation showed the highest protein content (13.1%). These findings are consistent with other similar studies, but grain protein at higher altitudes is greater than lower elevations.

Table 3 Correlation (r) between grain protein percent and soil component at different altitudes in Central Nepal

The soil quality (SOC, N, P) showed strong correlation with altitudes i.e. with increasing altitude, there was an in increase in all soil nutrient concentrations except K. The correlation between protein percent of finger millet grain and soil phosphorus and nitrogen showed a strong correlation with r = 0.92. Soil organic carbon also showed strong relation with r = 0.88 and r = 0.76 (Table 3). These results indicate that soil organic carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus have a crucial role to maintain grain nutrient composition of finger millet.

The variation in grain protein, calcium, and iron content at different altitudes might be due to the higher amount of SOC, N, and P in the soil because these components were found higher at upper altitudes. It justified the correlation coefficient (value of r) between grain nutrients and soil components (Table 3).

The grain protein increased along with increasing altitude in all landraces (Fig. 3) as well as soil components like phosphorus (Table 2), which might be due to the importance of P in the synthesis of protein, providing energy for the uptake and transfer of N in the grains of finger millet (Wekha et al. 2016). Similar results were also reported in cowpea (Magani and Kuchinda 2009), maize (Ali and Mohamad 2013), and lentils (Togay et al. 2008).

Comparatively low temperatures in higher elevation may stimulate seed protein synthesis and protein remobilization from vegetative organs to grains thereby increasing seed protein content (Diacono et al. 2012). However, at lower elevation daily maximum temperatures would reduce the duration of grain on genesis, result in a change in protein composition, and reduce the finger millet grain nutrients (Nadew 2018) and higher concentration of CO2 gas including several physiological phenomenon in the lower elevation could be the reason of low grain nutrient (Dong et al. 2018; Myers et al. 2017) in comparison with higher altitudes.

The application of N, P, K fertilizers at different development stages significantly increased grain yield and nutrient composition in crops (Spratt 1974) but, in this study the yield and nutrients were determined under natural condition without external input of fertilizers in the field. So, higher nutrient content in grain of finger millet may be due to combined effect of climatic and adaphic factors.

Calcium and iron

The result shows that finger millet grains are comparatively richer in minerals and micronutrients than other main cereals (Vadivoo et al. 1998). Finger millet as the richest source of calcium (Kumar et al. 2018), containing about 0.34% as compared with 0.01–0.06% in most other cereals (Kumar et al. 2018; Gupta et al. 2017). The analysis of nine varieties of millet revealed that Ca contents on grains varied from 0.05 to 0.32%. Gupta et al. (2011) reported 0.45% calcium in the grain of finger millet. However, the present study on ten local landraces of finger millet at three different altitudes showed higher Ca content, particularly high in the mid-hills of Central Nepal.

Finger millet also has the richest source of iron compare to other cereals viz rice, wheat and maize (Vijayakumari et al. 2003). According to Kumar et al. (2018), finger millet grain contains 0.32% iron, whereas, Admassu et al. (2009) reported grain iron of finger millet ranged from 0.05 to 0.54%. Singh and Srivastava (2006) reported that the iron content in 16 landraces of finger millet ranged between 0.36 and 0.54% with a mean value of 0.44%. Among 10 landraces of finger millet, Fe ranged from 0.36 to 0.49% with mean value 0.41% at 365 m elevation, while at 1040 m elevation, Fe ranged from 0.41 to 0.67% with mean value 0.53%, and at 1856 m elevation, Fe ranged from 0.66 to 0.82% with mean value 0.74%. These results indicate that iron content of finger millet grains is reasonably high at higher altitudes.

Soil chemical properties

The acidic nature of soil in higher altitudes as compared to lowlands is consistent with other findings in Nepal (Baumler and Zech 1994; Brown et al. 1999). The acidic nature of soil in the mid-hills was due to dominance of quartzite parent materials (Shrestha 2009).

The soil organic carbon percent was found highest (4.03%) in 1856 m elevation, which was similar with Phuyal (2013), followed by 1.88% and 1.91% in 1040 m and 365 m, respectively. The organic carbon of soil in the finger millet experiment site did not show that a specific pattern may be due to the farmers’ role of using farmyard fertilizer in the fields.

Grain nutrient-soil chemicals-altitudes correlation

The altitudinal relationship between nutrients in finger millet grains and soil was analyzed through correlation coefficient. The grain protein and altitude showed a strong positive relation with r = 0.98. This indicates that grain protein in finger millet increased with increasing altitude. Similarly, Ca and Fe in grain also showed a strong relationship between altitudes with r value 0.83 and 0.78, respectively (Table 3). The minerals (Ca and Fe) in finger millet grain increased with the altitude increase.

Sufficient amount of available phosphorus at higher altitudes probably enhanced the exchange reaction in soil by releasing ions in the microbial biomass that resulted in the greater availability of Ca also. The concentration of Ca in the soil solution helps to improve the architecture and energy provision through ATP, leading to the uptake of more quantities of calcium (Wafula et al. 2018; Sarwar et al. 2008) may be a cause of increased nutrient in grains of finger millet at higher altitudes.

Adequate available P also increases the uptake of iron from soil through roots (Wafula et al. 2018). Greater amount available P in soil could be a factor of increased of iron in grains of finger millet at higher altitudes.

Nutrient, altitude, and climate correlation

The correlation between growing season temperatures and altitudes showed strong negative correlations with grain protein, Ca, and Fe, is r = − 0.98, − 0.83, and − 0.83, respectively (Table 4). This implies that at higher elevations having at lower temperatures, finger millet protein, calcium, and iron content remain higher. This grain nutrient variation along different elevations may be due to the influence of genotype and environmental interactions in varying environment.

Table 4 Correlation (r) between climatic variables and grain nutrient of finger millet at different altitudes in Central Nepal

The yield and nutritional qualities of plants are influenced by numerous factors representing ecological conditions and management activities (Enoh et al. 2005). The altitudes and associated temperature, rainfall, slope and aspect of mountain as well as wind directions are important ecological factors that affect plants morphology, physiology and biochemistry of plants including nutrients compositions. Crops have obvious adaptation strategies by modifying their morphological and physiological characters (Royer et al. 2005; Qi et al. 2020). The average Ca increased by 0.21% and by 0.26% at higher altitude revealed increase of 0.11% and 0.21% of Fe due to the variation in soil characteristics and climate which determine the uptake of soil nutrients by plants (Begum et al. 2015).

Besides ecological and climatic factors, agronomic characteristics like yield, thousand grain weight can also influence the grain nutrients in finger millet. Grain yield and thousand grain weight of these 10 local landraces at different elevations did not show any specific pattern, however some reflection of nutrients with the yield and thousand grain weight has been seen in this study (Figs. 9 and 10).

Fig. 9
figure9

Grain yield (t/ha) of local landraces of finger millet along elevation gradient in CHAL

Fig. 10
figure10

Weight of thousand grains among the landraces at elevation gradient in CHAL

Conclusions

This study demonstrated the relationship among nutrients in finger millet (proteins, Ca and Fe), soil components (SOC, N, P and K), and altitudes, with respect to ambient climate. The grain nutrients (Nitrogen, Ca and Fe) of finger millet at higher altitudes were found higher than lower altitudes. The nutrients (SOC, N, P, K) in soil also showed the same trend, increasing with increased altitude. The grain nutrients were strongly correlated with soil components, indicating that grain is richer in the soil having more nutrients. Similarly, there was a strong negative correlation between grain nutrients and temperature, which indicates that increasing temperature would decrease the nutrient quality of soil as well as quality of grain nutrient in finger millet in central Nepal.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets of this study will be available from corresponding authors on genuine request.

Abbreviations

SOC:

Soil organic carbon

N:

Nitrogen

K:

Potassium

P:

Available phosphorus

Ca:

Calcium

Fe:

Iron

ATP:

Adinosine triphosphate

ppm:

Part per million

pH:

Percentage of hydrogen

FRTC:

Forests Research and Training Centre

CHAL:

Chitwan Annapurna Landscape

UTSCR:

Upper tropical to subtropical climatic region

LTCR:

Lower tropical climatic region

TCR:

Temperate climatic region

ATC:

Agriculture Technology Centre

References

  1. Admassu S, Teamier M, Alemu D. Chemical composition of local and improved finger millet [Eleusine corocana (L.) Gaertn.] varieties grown in Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2009;19(1):1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ali S, Mohamad HS. The effects of nitrogen fertilizer on ash, nitrate, organic carbon, protein and total yield of forage maize in semi-arid region of Iran. Tech J Eng Appl Sci. 2013;3:1680–4.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Amadou I, Mahamadou EG, Le GW. Millets, nutritional composition, some health benefits and processing—review. Food Sci Technol (Campinas). 2013;25(7):501–8. https://doi.org/10.9755/ejfa.v25i7.12045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Arjun D, Kumar R, Singh C. Finger millet for nutritional security and source of food. Adv Food Sci Technol. 2014;2(3):184–90.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bachar K, Mansour E, Khaled AB, Abid M, Haddad M, Yahya LB, Jarray NE, Ferchichi A. Content and mineral composition of the finger millet of the Oasis of Gabes Tunisia. J Agric Sci. 2013;5(2):219–26.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Barbeau WE, Hilu KW. Protein, calcium, iron, and amino acid content of selected wild and domesticated cultivars of finger millet. Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 1993;43:97–104.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Baumler R, Zech W. Soils of the high mountain region of Eastern Nepal, classification, distribution and soil forming processes. CATENA. 1994;22(2):85–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Begum K, Abdul H, Farhad S, Sayma K, Faruque M, Hossain D, Zakia P. Nutrient uptake by plants from different land types of Madhupur soils. Bangladesh J Sci Res. 2015;28:113e121.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bhagavatula S, Parthasarathy Rao P, Basavaraj G, Nagaraj N. Sorghum and millet economies in Asia—facts, trends and outlook. Patancheru: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics; 2013. p. 80. ISBN: 978-92-9066-557-1.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bremner JM, Mulvaney CS. Methods of soil buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum Gaertn.) populations revealed by AFLP analyses. Genes Genet Syst. 1982;76(1):47–52.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Brown S, Schreier H, Shah PB, Lavkulich LM. Soil nutrient budget modeling: an assessment of agricultural sustainability in Nepal. Soil Use Manag. 1999;15:1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cakmak I, Kutman UB. Agronomic biofortification of cereals with zinc: a review. Eur J Soil Sci. 2012;69:172–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ceasar AS, Maharajan T, Ajeesh Krishna TP, Ramakrishnan M, Victor Roch G, Satish L, Ignacimuthu S. Finger millet [Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.] improvement: current status and future interventions of whole genome sequence. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:1054. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chandra D, Chandra S. Finger millet (Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.): a power house of health benefiting nutrients, a review. Food Sci Hum Wellness. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fshw.2016.05.00.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chethan S, Malleshi NG. Finger millet polyphenols: optimization of extraction and the effect of pH on their stability. Food Chem. 2007;105:862–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dayakar RB, Bhaskarachary K, Rajendra PMP, Bala KD, Dhanasri K, Nageswara RTG. Nutritional and health benefits of millets. Rajendranagar: ICAR—Indian Institute of Millets Research; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  17. DHM. Observed climate trend analysis in the districts and physiographic zones of Nepal (1971–2014). Kathmandu: Department of Hydrology and Meteorology; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Diacono M, Castrignano A, Troccoli A, De Benedetto D, Basso B. Spatial and temporal variability of wheat grain yield and quality in a Mediterranean environment: a multivariate geo-statistical approach. Field Crop Res. 2012;131:1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dong J, Gruda N, Lam SK, Li X, Duan Z. Effects of elevated CO2 on nutritional quality of vegetables: a review. Front Plant Sci. 2018. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00924.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Enoh MB, Kijora C, Peters KJ, Yonkeu S. Effect of stage of harvest on DM yield, nutrient content, in vitro and in situ parameters and their relationship of native and Brachiaria grasses in the Adamawa plateau of Cameroon. Livest Res Rural Dev. 2005;17:1e14.

    Google Scholar 

  21. FAO. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). Amino acid scoring pattern. In: Protein quality evaluation. Rome: FAO/WHO Food and Nutrition Paper; 1991. p. 12–24.

    Google Scholar 

  22. FAO. Sorghum and millets in human nutrition, vol. 68. FAO Food and nutrition series. Rome: FAO; 2005. p. 277.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gupta N, Gupta AK, Singh NK, Kumar A. Differential expression of PBFD of transcription factor in different tissues of three finger millet genotypes differing in seed protein content and color. Plant Mol Biol Rep. 2011;29:69–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11105-010-0208-y.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gupta SM, Arora S, Mirza N, Pande A, Lata C, Puranik S. Finger millet: a “certain” crop for an “uncertain” future and a solution to food insecurity and hidden hunger under stressful environments. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:643. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00643.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hanway JJ, Heidel H. Soil analysis methods as used in Iowa State. Bull Coll Soil Test Lab. 1952;57:1–131.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hilu K, Barbeau WE. Protein, calcium, iron and amino acid content of selected wild and domesticated cultivars of finger millet. Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 1993;43(2):97–104.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Horneck DA, Miller RO. Determination of total nitrogen in plant tissue. In: Kalra TP, editor. Hand book of reference methods for plant analysis. CRC Press: Boca Raton; 1988. p. 75–83.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kumar A, Metwal M, Kaur S, Gupta AK, Puranik S, Singh S. Nutraceutical value of finger millet [Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.], and their improvement using omics approaches. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:934. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00934.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kumar A, Metwal M, Kaur S, Gupta AK, Puranik S, Singh S, Singh M, Gupta S, Babu BK, Sood S, Yadav R. Nutraceutical value of Finger millet (Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.), and their improvement using omics approaches. Front Plant Sci. 2018;7:1–1447.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kumssa DB, Joy EJM, Ander EL, Watts MJ, Young SD, Walker S. Dietary calcium and zinc deficiency risks are decreasing but remain prevalent. Sci Rep. 2015;5:10974. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep10974.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Magani IE, Kuchinda C. Effects of phosphorus fertilizer on growth, yield and crude protein content of cowpea (Vigna unguculata [L.] Walp) in Nigeria. J Appl Biosci. 2009;23:1387–93.

    Google Scholar 

  32. MALMC. Statistical information of Nepalese agriculture. Ministry of Agriculture, Land Management and Cooperatives. Promotion and Statistical Division and Agriculture Statistics Division. Singha Durbar, Kathmandu, Nepal; 2018.

  33. Mbithi MS, Ooghe W, Van Camp J, Nagundi D, Huyghebaert A. Amino acid profile after sprouting, autoclaving and lactic acid fermentation of finger millet (Elusine coracana) and kidney beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). J Agric Food Chem. 2000;48:3081–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. McLean EO, et al. Soil pH and lime requirement. In: Page AL, et al., editors. Methods of soil analysis: chemical and microbiological properties. ASA and SSSA: Madison; 1982. p. 199–224.

    Google Scholar 

  35. MoAD. Statistical information on Nepalese agriculture. Ministry of Agricultural Development, Agribusiness Promotion and Statistical Division and Agriculture Statistics Division, Singha Durbar, Kathmandu, Nepal; 2017.

  36. MoE. Status of climate change in Nepal. Ministry of Environment (MoE), Kathmandu, Nepal; 2011.

  37. MoFSC. Strategy and action plan 2016–2025, Chitwan Annapurna Landscape, Nepal. Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation, Kathmandu Nepal; 2015.

  38. Myers SS, Smith MR, Guth S, Golden CD, Vaitla B, Mueller ND, Dangour AD, Huybeers P. Climate change and global food systems: potential impacts on food security and under nutrition. Annu Rev Public Health. 2017;38:259–77.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Nadew BB. Effects of climatic and agronomic factors on yield and quality of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seed: a review on selected factors. Adv Crop Sci Technol. 2018;6:2. https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-8863.1000356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Obilana AB, Manyasa E. Millets. In: Belton PS, Taylor JRN, editors. Pseudocereals and less common cereals: grain properties and utilization potential. Springer: New York; 2002. p. 177–217.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Olson SR, Sommers LE, et al. Phosphorus. In: Page AL, et al., editors. Methods of soil analysis: chemical and microbiological properties. Madison: ASA & SSSA; 1982. p. 403–30.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Phuyal N. Climate change vulnerability, impacts and adaptation of agriculture in a mountain region of western Nepal. A Master's thesis submitted to Kathmandu University Dhulikhel, Nepal; 2013.

  43. Puranik S, Kam J, Sahu PP, Yadav R, Srivastava RK, Ojulong H. Harnessing finger millet to combat calcium deficiency in humans: challenges and prospects. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:1311. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01311.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Qi J, Liu W, Jiao T, Hamblin A. Variation in morphological and physiological characteristics of wild Elymus nutans ecotypes from different altitudes in the northeastern Tibetan Plateau. J Sens. 2020;20:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2869030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 2013. https://www.R-project.org/.

  46. Royer DL, Wilf P, Janesko DA, Kowalski EA, Dilcher DL. Correlations of climate and plant ecology to leaf size and shape: potential proxies for the fossil record. Am J Bot. 2005;92(7):1141–51.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Saleh ASM, Zhang Q, Chen J, Shen Q. Millet grains: nutritional quality, processing, and potential health benefits. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2013;12:281–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12012.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Sarwar G, Hussain N, Schmeisky H, Muhammad S, Ibrahim M, Safdar E. Use of compost an environment friendly technology for enhancing rice-wheat production in Pakistan. Pak J Bot. 2008;40:1553–8.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Sharma D, Jamra G, Singh UM, Sood S, Kumar A. Calcium biofortification: three pronged molecular approaches for dissecting complex trait of calcium nutrition in finger millet (Eleusine coracana) for devising strategies of enrichment of food crops. Front Plant Sci. 2017;7:2028. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.02028.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Shrestha RK. Soil fertility under improved and conventional management practices in Sanga, Kavrepalanchowk district, Nepal. Nepal Agric Res J. 2009;9:27–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Shrestha UB, Gautam S, Bawa KS. Wide spread climate change in the Himalayas and associated changes in local ecosystems. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(5):e36741. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036741.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Singh P, Srivastava S. Nutritional composition of sixteen new varieties of finger millet. J Community Mobil Sustain Dev. 2006;1(2):81–4.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Smith MR, Myers SS. Impact of anthropogenic CO2 emission on global human nutrition. Nat Clim Change. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0253-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Spratt ED. Effect of ammonium and nitrate forms of fertilizer-N and their time of application on utilization of N by wheat. Agron. J. 1974;66:57–61.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Togay Y, Togay N, Dogan Y. Research on the effect of phosphorus and molybdenum applications on theyield and yield parameters in Lentil (Lens culinaris Medic). Afr J Biotechnol. 2008;7:1256–60.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Upadhyaya HD, Ramesh S, Sharma S, Singh SK, Varshney SK, Sarma NDRK, Ravishankar CR, Narasimhudu Y, Reddy VG, Sahrawat KL, Dhanalakshmi TN, Mgonja MA, Parzies HK, Gowda CII, Singh S. Genetic diversity for grain nutrients contents in a core collection of finger millet (Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.) germ plasm. Field Crops Res. 2011;121:42–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Vadivoo AS, Joseph R, Garesan NM. Genetic variability and calcium contents in finger millet (Eleusine coracana L. Gaertn.) in relation to grain colour. Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 1998;52(4):353–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Vetriventhan M, Upadhyaya HD. Variability for productivity and nutritional traits in germplasm of Kodo millet an underutilized nutrient rich climate smart crop. Crop Sci. 2019;59:1095–106.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Vijayakumari J, Mushtari Begum J, Begum S, Gokavi S. Sensory attributes of ethinic foods from finger millet (Eleusine coracana). Recent Trends in Millet Processing and utilization. In: Proceeding of national seminar on processing and utilization of millet for nutrition security held on October 7–8, 2003 organized under RNPSI (NATP) at CCSHAV, Hisar; 2003. p. 7–12.

  60. Wafula WN, Korir NK, Ojulong HF, Siambi M, Gweyi-Onyango JP. Protein, calcium, zinc, and iron contents of finger millet grain response to varietal differences and phosphorus application in Kenya. Agronomy. 2018;8:24. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy8020024.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Walkley A, Black IA. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 1934;37:29–38.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. WECS. Water resources of Nepal in the context of climate change. Kathmandu: Water and Energy Commission Secretariat (WECS); 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Wekha NW, Nicholas KK, Henry FO, Moses S, Joseph PGO. Phosphorus influence on plant tissue nitrogen contents and yield attributes of finger millet varieties in semi-arid region of Kenya. Int J Plant Soil Sci. 2016;13:1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Zobel DD, Jha PK, Behan MJ, Yadav UKR. A practical manual for ecology. Kathmandu: Ratna Book Distributors; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to the Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Integrated Pest Management funded by the U.S. Agency for International Development, under the terms of Cooperative Agreement No. AID-OAA-L-15-00001 for financial support. Thanks to Dr. Muniappan Rangaswamy of Virginia Tech, USA for continued support and encouragement. We also thank Ms. Sara Hendry, Virginia Tech for editing the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Integrated Pest Management funded by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) under the Cooperative Agreement No. AID-OAAL-15-00001. Funding agency played vital role for designing of the study and writing of the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DRL: primary researcher, designed concept collected field data, gathering and processing of all data source, and prepared manuscript. MS, and PKJ supervised the works and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Dol Raj Luitel or Pramod K. Jha.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable. We did research on crop plant and did not handle animals along protected areas. Thus no ethics protocol was required to be followed.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Luitel, D.R., Siwakoti, M. & Jha, P.K. Nutrients in finger millet and soil at different elevation gradients in Central Nepal. CABI Agric Biosci 1, 20 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43170-020-00018-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Altitudes
  • Iron
  • Nitrogen
  • Nutrient phosphorus
  • Potassium
  • Soil organic carbon
\