Skip to main content

Improving potassium use efficiency of sugarcane through the use of polyhalite

Abstract

Background

Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) is an important crop in the production of food and energy in tropical and subtropical regions. To provide plants with what they need, highly concentrated fertilizers are often deployed which can result in imbalances in plant nutrition. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficiency of polyhalite (K2Ca2Mg(SO4)4·2H2O) as an alternative source of multinutrients for sugarcane compared to single sources of K, Ca, Mg and S.

Methods

A glasshouse experiment was carried out on a low-K Entisol from the sugarcane cultivar CV7870. A completely randomized design was used with different K fertilizer management strategies as follows: four K dosages (0, 21, 42 and 63 mg dm−3) associated to distinct sources, namely: polyhalite (PHY); potassium chloride (KCl); potassium chloride+polyhalite in a 1:1 ratio (½KP), and potassium chloride combined with phosphogypsum and kieserite balancing Ca, Mg and S dosages as supplied by pure polyhalite (KGK). Two growth cycles in 6 dm3 soil pots were evaluated: cane plant harvested at 131 days after transplanting, and ratoon harvested at 253 days after transplanting for the determination of dry matter production. Immediately before harvesting in both cycles, leaf nutrient content (K, Ca, S and Cl) was determined using a hand-held X-ray fluorescence spectrometer.

Results

In general, shoot dry matter and nutrient uptake were higher with the highest K dosage applied and K sources containing Ca and S in the formulation PHY; ½KP; and KGK, for both growth cycles. However, when these sources were provided at the lowest dosage, high agronomic efficiency was observed in all nutrients assessed. Consequently, the cultivar CV7870 was responsive to K application. However, increments in the K dosage resulted in low agronomic efficiency.

Conclusions

This study indicates that PHY is an effective fertilizer for sugarcane farmers seeking to improve nutrient uptake in a low-K Entisol for both cane plant and ratoon. A mix of PHY and KCl is a potential multi-nutrient fertilizer for managing sugarcane production.

Background

In sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L., Poaceae), K is an essential element with the highest absorption levels and export (Filho 1993), found mainly in the ratoon cycles (Korndörfer and Oliveira 2005), on account of the role they play in the transporting of sugars (Cai et al. 2012), nitrogen metabolism, water absorption and transport, osmoregulation, enzyme activation and load neutralization (Römheld and Kirkby 2010). Thus, K is crucial to the maintaining of sugarcane yields (Paneque et al. 1992). Brazil is the world's largest sugarcane producer (FAO 2021), with an estimated stalk production of approximately 568.4 million tons from 8.26 million hectares in the 2021/2022 growing season (CONAB 2021). Despite the large crop area, the average stalk yield continues to be low, approximately 68.78 Mg ha−1 (CONAB 2021).

This low average yield of sugarcane is most likely responsible for the recent agricultural expansion into new areas with low fertility and acidic soils (Bernardo et al. 2019; Bordonal et al. 2018). Brazil is the country with the largest area of acidic soil (Vitorello et al. 2005), where Entisols alone account for approximately 50 million hectares of the country’s surface area (Spera et al. 1999; Santos et al. 2011).

Additionally, in highly weathered tropical soils, K dynamics are complex due to their low concentration in parental material and fixation in the structure of 2:1-layer silicate minerals (Conti et al. 2001; Santos et al. 2015). Thus, the use of mineral fertilizers has become mandatory for production in Brazil, making this country the world’s second largest consumer of K, in the form of potassium chloride (KCl) as the most widespread potassium-bearing fertilizer in sugarcane production (ANDA 2017). To compensate for its drawbacks in the context of agricultural sustainability, studies on the rational use of fertilizers has become a critical issue, since this accounts for a large portion of production costs (Cortez et al. 2010).

Other elements essential to improving sugarcane yield are calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg) and sulfur (S). Calcium is essential to cell wall stabilization and strengthening, as well as to the regulation of membrane permeability and cell division (Oliveira et al. 2018). Furthermore, magnesium is the core atom of the chlorophyll molecule, and it is required as an enzyme promotor in protein synthesis by bridging ribosome subunits (Garcia et al. 2020). Sulfur is a necessary component of amino acids, and thus proteins, as well as instrumental in the formation of coenzymes. It is also required for the activity of nitrate reductase and the production of chlorophyll (Singh and Tiwari 2018).

An alternative multi-nutrient source emerging on the world fertilizer market is polyhalite (PYH), an evaporite mineral found in marine sedimentary deposits, described by the chemical formula K2Ca2Mg(SO4)4•2(H2O) equivalent to 13.0% K, 13.3% Ca, 4.0% Mg, and 21.3% S (Manning, 2017). The use of PYH for agricultural purposes began when a deposit of commercial size was discovered in the early twentieth century in New Mexico and western Texas, United States (Hoots 1925; Mansfield and Lang 1929) and reported in some countries, such as Austria (Stromeyer 1820), Germany (Schober 1868), France (Cloizeaux 1867), Italy (Cortese 1922), Russia (Kurnakov et al. 1937), Poland (Buyalov and Lepeshkov 1937) and India (Gohil et al. 1996). However, commercial interest was abandoned after the discovery of a huge deposit of sylvinite (KCl.NaCl) in Saskatchewan, Canada.

Recently, since the discovery of Zechstein deposits located in North Yorkshire, in the United Kingdom, the world's largest highest grade deposit of PYH (Kemp et al. 2016), it has again aroused interest in the use of this mineral as fertilizer, promoting new research on crops such as rape oilseed (Dugast 2015), mustard (Tiwari et al. 2015), cabbage and cauliflower (Satisha and Ganeshamurthy 2016), peanut (Hoang et al. 2016), tea (PVFCCo 2016a; Zhou et al. 2019), coffee (PVFCCo 2016b), potato (Mello et al. 2018a), tomato (Mello et al. 2018b, 2019), corn (Pavuluri et al. 2017; Molin et al. 2019) and alfalfa (Bernardi et al. 2018). Taken together, these studies indicate that PYH is as effective as KCl or K2SO4, that provides a slower release of nutrients to plant growth. However, few of these studies balanced S, Ca and Mg concentrations similar to PYH treatments (Barbarick 1991; Mello et al. 2018a, b), avoiding negative plant responses derived from Ca, Mg or S not provided by non PYH treatments.

In view of the above, research into K dynamics in weathered tropical soils under PYH fertilization, pertaining to K availability and uptake by sugarcane, is still limited in the literature. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the agronomic performance of PYH in both cane plant and ratoon as a multi-nutrient source for sugarcane on a low-K Entisol contrasting with a single K fertilizer source (potassium chloride) combined with Ca, Mg and S sources (phosphogypsum and kieserite).

Methods

Pot experiment with sugarcane

The experiment was conducted in a glasshouse at the Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture (ESALQ/USP), Piracicaba-Brazil (22°42ʹS, 47°38ʹW), with an average air temperature of 30/18 °C (day/night) and relative humidity between 50 and 90%. The soil used was collected from the 0–20 cm layer of a native area in nearby sugarcane farms in Agudos-SP (22°33ʹS, 49°06ʹW), and was classified as Entisol (Quartzipsamment) (Soil Survey Staff 2014) with 945, 17 and 38 g dm−3 of sand, silt, and clay, respectively. Afterwards, the soil was air-dried and sieved in a 2 mm mesh, and physicochemical analysis was carried out for initial characterization of nutrient contents and texture as follows: pH(CaCl2): 4.4; organic matter: 8.0 g dm−3; available P: 6.0 mg dm−3; available K: 55.0 mg dm−3; exchangeable Ca: 120.0 mg dm−3; exchangeable Mg: 48.0 mg dm−3; and exchangeable acidity (H + Al): 235.0 mg dm−3 (Raij et al. 2001).

Uniform stalks of the CV7870 sugarcane variety were collected from 8-month-old plant growth for the second season in the field in the same soil sampling location. Stalks were cut in stem-node segments for propagation in washed sand for 25 days. Afterwards, uniform seedlings were selected for transplanting into pots.

The experiment was set up in a completely randomized design with four replicates, in a factorial scheme with four K sources: KCl (pure), PYH (pure), ½KCl + ½PYH (½KP) and KCl + GYP + KIE (KGK); and three doses of K: 21, 42 and 63 mg dm−3 soil (50, 100, and 150 kg ha−1 K2O, respectively), with two additional controls: absolute control (no NPK fertilizer) and control (no K fertilizer) (Table 1). The experimental unit was a plastic (PVC) pot of 6 L capacity containing 6 dm3 of soil (dry basis) and one sugarcane seedling. Plants were watered 3 times per week with deionized water to maintain soil moisture ~ 70% of the maximum soil water-holding capacity, based on the weight of random experimental units (n = 10), during the experimental period.

Table 1 Treatments used as a multi-nutrient source of K in an acidic sandy Entisol for sugarcane development in a pot trial

The treatments were applied to each experimental unit directly before transplanting, obtaining powdered formulations to mix the K treatments uniformly by shaking the soil in a plastic bag for 2 min. Additionally, powdered phosphate fertilizer (Monoammonium Phosphate-11% N, 52% P2O5) at a total rate of 150 mg dm−3 P2O5 (300 kg ha−1 P2O5) was applied at that time. Nitrogen (N) was supplied as ammonium nitrate (30% N) in three applications: 30 mg dm−3 of N (60 kg ha−1 N) at transplanting and two topdressing applications of 15 mg dm−3 of N (30 kg ha−1 N) at 15 and 50 days after transplanting. Nitrogen fertilizer was applied diluted in the irrigation water. For the treatments with KGK, the dosage was calculated to supply Ca, Mg and S and balanced according to the quantity supplied in the PYH (pure) treatments by using phosphogypsum and kieserite (Table 1). However, the Ca dosage was still lower than pure PYH. Micronutrients were provided at transplanting for all pots in the following amounts (mg dm−3): 5.0 Fe; 5.0 Zn; 4.5 Mn; 1.5 Cu; 0.3 B and 0.3 Mo.

After the first sugarcane cycle harvest (131 d) (cane plant), N fertilizer was applied again during the second cycle (ratoon) with top-dressing application at a dosage of 30 mg dm−3 (60 kg ha−1 N) per event, distributed in two applications at 15 and 30 days after harvest. Potassium treatments were not re-applied to evaluate its effect on ratoon. However, phosphate and micronutrients were not supplied during the second cycle.

Sugarcane dry matter and nutrient content

At 131 d after transplanting sugarcane plants were harvested by cutting the shoot at the soil surface. Afterwards, the shoot was oven dried at 60 °C for 72 h (constant weight) and weighed for determining dry matter (DM) production. The root system was left to allow regrowth simulating a field ratoon. The harvest of the second cycle was evaluated at 122 d after regrowth (253 days after transplanting), and the DM was similarly determined.

Immediately before the harvest in both cycles, leaf nutrient content (K, Ca, S and Cl) was identified by cutting the middle portion of the Top Visible Dewlap (TDV). Directly after cutting, the leaf sample was washed with deionized water and dried with a clean towel paper before analysis. Next, the sample was placed into a hand-held X-ray fluorescence spectrometer, the DELTA Professional model (Olympus, USA) equipped with an Rh target X-ray tube and a 10 mm2 silicon drift detector (SDD) operated at 15 kV and 200 μA. The dwell time was 90,000 ms. A docking station and a lead enclosure radiation shield were used. A randomly selected sampling spot in the interveinal region on the adaxial side of the TDV was analyzed in triplicate.

Data and statistical analysis

The effectiveness of each K source relative to the standard KCl was calculated from the yield response relationships using the Eq. (1):

$${\text{RAE}}\left( \% \right) \, = \, \left[ {\left( {{\text{Y}}_{{\text{i}}} - {\text{Y}}_{0} } \right)/\left( {{\text{Y}}_{{{\text{KCl}}}} - {\text{Y}}_{0} } \right)} \right]{\text{ x 1}}00$$
(1)

where, Yi is the shoot DM yield in treatments with added K fertilizers (g pot−1); YKCl the shoot DM yield with potassium chloride (reference fertilizer, RAE = 100%) treatment and Y0 the shoot DM yield without K fertilizer (absolute control).

The K, Ca and S uptake were calculated as the product of a K, Ca and S concentration and shoot DM yield, applying another Eq. (2):

$${\text{K}},{\text{Ca}}\; {\text{or}}\;{\text{S}}\;{\text{uptake}}\;({\text{mg}}\,{\text{shoot}}^{-1}) \, = {\text{ K}},{\text{Ca}}\; {\text{or}}\;{\text{S}}\;{\text{content }}\left( {\text{mg}\,{\text{g}}^{-1} } \right) \times {\text{DM}}\;{\text{yield}}({\text{g shoot}}^{- 1} )$$
(2)

Agronomic efficiency (AE) of each nutrient was calculated according to Eq. (3):

$${\text{AE }}\left( {{\text{mg mg}}^{{ - {1}}} } \right) = \left( {{\text{shoot DM yield with added nutrient fertilizers }}\left( {{\text{mg pot}}^{{ - {1}}} } \right) \, - {\text{ Shoot DM yield in absolute control}}} \right) \, \left( {{\text{mg pot}}^{{ - {1}}} } \right)/{\text{nutrient applied via fertilizer }}\left( {{\text{mg pot}}^{{ - {1}}} } \right)$$
(3)

All data were submitted to Shapiro–Wilk’s normality test and Bartlett’s homogeneity test, and suitable transformations were generated using Box-Cox techniques (Box and Cox 1964). Outliers were identified by standard deviation analysis (Aguinis et al. 2013) and removed when needed before carrying out variance analysis (ANOVA). The data was submitted to a two-way ANOVA, in case of significance in the interaction between the K source in each dosage; and the effects of K dosages in each K source were compared by Duncan’s multiple range test, respectively. In the absence of interaction, the t test (LSD) was used to evaluate the isolated effect of sources, and the effect of the dosage was adjusted to a linear or quadratic regression model. Relative agronomic efficiency (RAE) was compared by Dunnett’s test. Principal component analysis (PCA) was carried out and visualized using PAST, version 3.21 (University of Oslo, Norway).

All statistical analyses were carried out using PROC-GLM and PROC-MIXED in SAS statistical software version 9.3 (SAS Institute 2008) and the graphs and regressions by Sigma Plot (Systat Software, San Jose, CA). The determinations of statistical significance were based on a critical value of α = 0.10.

Results

Sugarcane response to fertilizer application

The shoot DM yield of sugarcane showed a linear adjustment influenced by K dosages, regardless of the source/formulation applied, for both the first (cane plant) and second cycle (ratoon) (Fig. 1). The first cycle (cane-plant) resulted in the highest DM in all treatments (mean 38.3 g shoot−1) compared to the ratoon crop (mean 33.5 g shoot−1). For the second growth cycle (ratoon), the residual of supplying K resulted in a 16% higher DM yield compared to control. Furthermore, linear increases in DM were observed when high K dosages were applied. For instance, for cane plant, every mg K dm−3 applied increased 0,13 g shoot−1 and 0,09 g shoot−1 for ratoon. As regards the accumulated DM from both cycles, plants receiving no K fertilizer (absolute control and control N+P) produced 50 and 9 g shoot−1 less than those receiving K fertilizer, respectively. Additionally, it increased according to the dosage of K application relative to control (5, 11 and 19% with 21, 42 and 63 mg K dm−3, respectively; Fig. 1b). The coefficient of variation was between 2 and 13%, showing low variability between replicates within each treatment.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Shoot dry matter yield (g shoot−1) of sugarcane as affected by K dosages applied at transplanting from two consecutive harvests (cane-plant and ratoon) and accumulated. Dosage comparison: regression analysis, the * in the R2 indicates differences between dosage at a level of significance of 10%. ns: non-significant. Error bars (T) represent the standard error of the means (n = 4)

In general, all leaf nutrient uptakes analyzed (K, Ca, S and Cl) were affected by K dosages and sources in an isolated way in both growth cycles of cane plant and ratoon. However, the latter showed a decline in uptake irrespective of the source and dosage supplied (Fig. 2). For K, the uptake was influenced by sources in cane-plant, with better results using PYH, KGK and ½KP than KCl, with mean values of 630, 607 and 656 mg shoot−1 respectively (Fig. 2a), representing an average of 36% higher uptake compared to KCl treatment. However, in the ratoon, KCl together with ½KP, KGK and PYH achieved an average of 60% higher K uptake compared to control (N+P). Dosage also influenced K uptake with a quadratic adjustment in the first growth cycle (Fig. 2a). A variation in K uptake under dosage compared to control in cane-plant was observed. Additionally, in ratoon the highest dosage (63 mg K dm−3) had promoted a significant increment in K uptake, with a mean value of 457 mg shoot−1, approximately 202% higher than that observed in the control (K0).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Uptake of a potassium, b sulfur, c calcium and d chloride as affected by potassium fertilizers in cane and ratoon crop of sugarcane. Source comparison: columns followed by the same uppercase letter do not differ statistically by Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.10) in the cane plant crop, and columns followed by the same lowercase letter do not differ statistically by Duncan’s multiple range test in the ratoon crop. Dosage comparison: regression analysis, the * in the R2 indicates differences between dosage at a level of significance of 10%. ns non-significant. Error bars (T) represent the standard error of the means (n = 4). Abs control: absolute control K0 = non-K application; K21 = application of 21 mg K dm−3; K42 = application of 42 mg K dm−3; K63 = application of 63 mg K dm−3

Sulfur uptake was affected by K dosage and sources, mainly in the first cycle, cane-plant (Fig. 2b). Thus, PYH exhibited the highest S uptake (150 mg shoot−1), whereas KCl did not have any variation compared to control (87 and 77 mg shoot−1, respectively). As regards the dosage, higher amounts of K fertilizer imply increments in S uptake in sugarcane. Based on this parameter, the following ranking was obtained: K63 > K42 > K21 > K0. No significant variation in the S uptake in ratoon crop was found for the treatments, no after effect of the sources over the time being reported.

Calcium uptake was 400% lower under absolute control compared to the average of K dosages and sources in the cane-plant (Fig. 2c). In the ratoon cycle, PYH and KCl had lower Ca uptake compared to the ½KP and KGK formulations. Non-significant interactions (p > 0.10) between sources were found in the cane-plant and between K dosages in the ratoon.

Chloride uptake was affected by K formulations and dosages. The largest increment in Cl uptake was observed under KGK in both growth cycles, cane plant and ratoon, approximately 235 and 116 mg Cl shoot−1 respectively (Fig. 2d). In general, Cl uptake under PYH and ½KP were less expressive than pure KCl, achieving similar values to control in the cane plant; however, in ratoon only PYH reached similar Cl uptake compared to control. Additionally, all dosages applied significantly outperformed control treatments, exhibiting the after effect of fertilizers on Cl uptake by sugarcane.

Discussion

Sugarcane agronomic efficiency

The relative agronomic effectiveness (RAE) of sugarcane was not significant depending on the source of K applied (Additional file 1: Fig. S1), indicating that PYH is similar to KCl for supplying nutrients for this crop. Moreover, RAE varied between 92 and 106%, which means that K formulations evaluated here were as efficient as the reference fertilizer irrespective of the growth cycle. Despite the critical indicators of low soil fertility in this study such as soil acidity and sandy texture, the use of PHY has the potential to sustainably increase sugarcane DM production and nutrient uptake. Similar results have been reported by Pavinato et al. (2020) and Bhatt et al. (2021), in acid and sandy soils, respectively. Additionally, Barbarick (1991), assessing continuous cropping of sorghum-Sudan grass comparing PYH and other soluble sources of K, Ca, Mg and S in a glasshouse, noted that PYH was as effective as or superior to soluble fertilizers, as found in our study. Similarly, Yermiyahu et al. (2017) have reported similar findings, when evaluating the efficiency of PYH relative to equivalent soluble salts on wheat, where PYH was at least as good as the reference fertilizers, also indicating that PYH is a good alternative K source for agriculture.

Agronomic efficiency of K (AEK) is presented in Fig. 3a. Supplying K in lower dosage resulted in higher AEK in both growth cycles, cane plant and ratoon, regardless of the K sources used. The dosage of 63 mg K dm−3 reduced AEK by 2.3 times compared to the lowest dosage used (21 mg K dm−3) in cane plant and approximately 2.6 times in ratoon. The AEK varied between 87 to 201 mg mg−1 in cane plant and 59–160 mg mg−1 in ratoon, averaging 135 mg mg−1 and 101 mg mg−1, respectively. Comparing these results to K uptake (Fig. 2a), differences in plant response to K dosage can be explained by the genetic potential of the sugarcane, since the variety CV7870 is adapted to more fertile soils, and is exceptionally responsive to K applications by increasing DM production but less agronomically efficient. Additionally, K uptake is more efficient than Ca or Mg on account of the effective H + /K + symport (a protein that transports H + and K + ions simultaneously across root cell membranes) (Mengel et al. 2001). Kwong (2002) showed that most of the sugarcane K demand is absorbed before maximum dry matter accumulates, which is more concentrated over the maximum leaf area, and emphasizes the importance of a good initial K supply for positive whole cycle plant development. Similarly, Medina et al. (2013) reported higher K concentration in sugarcane at the beginning of plant development.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Agronomic efficiency of a potassium (AEK) and b sulfur (AES), considering three dosages of K fertilizers (KCl, PHY, KGK and ½KP) in cane and ratoon crop of sugarcane. Columns followed by the same uppercase letter do not differ statistically by Duncan's multiple range test (p < 0.10) in the cane plant crop, and columns followed by the same lowercase letter do not differ statistically by Duncan's multiple range test in the ratoon crop. Agronomic efficiency of calcium (AECa), considering c cane plant and d ratoon crop of sugarcane. Dosage comparison: columns followed by the same uppercase letter do not differ statistically by Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.10); source comparison: columns followed by the same lowercase letter do not differ statistically by Duncan's multiple range test. Error bars (T) represent the standard error of the means (n = 4)

Considering the sources with S in their formulation (PYH, KGK and ½KP), the agronomic efficiency of sulfur (AES) varied significantly due to the dosage used, irrespective of sources in both growth cycles (Fig. 3b), indicating similar dynamics to AEK. The lowest AES was found on applying 63 mg K dm−3, with average values of 53 and 36 mg mg−1 in cane plant and ratoon respectively, while under lower K dosages the AES increased progressively, obtaining the superior AES at 21 mg K dm−3, with mean values of 122 and 95 mg mg−1 in cane-plant and ratoon respectively. Kaler et al. (2017) reported no S concentration response to elemental S fertilizer application rates of 0, 90, 224, 448 kg S ha−1 in sugarcane, although the authors used a non-soluble source of S that may take several weeks to convert to a soluble form in the soil, whose behavior is completely different from a soluble source like PYH (Barbier et al. 2017), which solubilizes in days or weeks according to our results.

With regard to Ca in fertilizer formulations (PYH, KGK and ½KP), agronomic efficiency of calcium (AECa) was significantly affected by source and dosage though without any interaction in both cane plant and ratoon (Fig. 3c, d, respectively). Fertilization with ½KP increased AECa in the three dosages evaluated in both cane plant and ratoon. In contrast, when Ca was applied via PYH or KGK, the AECa was similar in both cane plant and ratoon regardless of the dosage used. Furthermore, AECa increased on account of K fertilization at the lowest dosage of K assessed. For instance, in cane plant under application of 21 mg K dm−3 the AECa was two times higher than in the highest K dosage applied (Fig. 3c), and in ratoon this efficiency displayed the same performance as cane plant but in lower proportions (Fig. 3d). Contrasting Ca uptake and AECa, the application of sources using a multinutrient criteria demonstrates an improvement in DM yield of sugarcane which may indicate an adequate nutritional balance for plant growth. Calcium plays a key role in sugarcane physiology and is thus required for photosynthesis, carbon assimilation, and, as a result, dry matter production. This nutrient is also involved in secondary messenger signaling (Steinhorst and Kudla 2014), gene expression and protein regulation (Kudla et al. 2018), membrane permeability maintenance and regulation (Poovaiah and Leopold 1973), and the cross-linking and structural reinforcement of cell-wall constituents (Chan et al. 2017). Consequently, in addition to the specific increase in Ca absorption in response to PHY, the critical role of Ca in sugarcane growth and development was highlighted.

In general, no significant relationship between DM and K, S, Ca and Cl content in leaves were detected. However, it was observed that most of the plants with leaf content below the critical level (McCray et al. 2013) were linked to ratoon cycle, probably experiencing a hidden hunger scenario. Additionally, shoot DM oscillated between 25 and 50 g, except for the absolute control (13 g). In this regard, plants derived from cane bud propagation exhibited sufficient concentrations of K, Ca and S for an initial development. However, higher dosages of K formulations applied led to luxury consumption suggesting that K, Ca, and S were not limiting crop development, irrespective of the K fertilizer source applied.

Overview of sugarcane response to fertilization

As a general view among K dosage and sources/formulations, both cane plant and ratoon biomass production (DM) and accumulated nutrient uptake were correlated to high dosages applied and K sources containing Ca and S in the formulation (Fig. 4). A high foliar biomass is the basis of dry matter production and a requirement for the subsequent increase in sugar. Considering the accumulated results (cane plant and ratoon), the formulation ½KP showed the highest K and Ca uptake and thus the highest DM yield, proving to be the best option for supplying K, Ca and S for sugarcane. The use of PHY as a complementary fertilizer can enhance the DM production (Chen et al. 2022). This condition is promoted as a result of reduced competition between Cl and SO4 for absorption by plant roots in the PYH, KGK; and ½KP treatments when compared to sole KCl treatments where the presence of Cl and the lack of SO4 in the soil or the KCl fertilizer can make this competition more severe (Bhatt et al. 2021). However, when these sources were provided at the lowest dosage the highest correlation was observed with superior agronomic efficiency for all nutrients assessed (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Principal component analysis (PCA) of accumulated K, S, Ca and Cl uptake, accumulated shoot dry matter and agronomic efficiency of K, Ca and S in sugarcane treated with three K dosages (21, 42 and 63 mg K dm−3) and four distinct sources/formulations. AE agronomic efficiency, acc accumulated

The two-component analysis explained 81.3% of the total variation among traits. Using the K dosage, the PCA was grouped into two main clusters: PYH, KGK; and ½KP, applied at 42 and 63 mg K dm−3 which were in quadrant I and are characterized with high S, K, Ca and Cl uptake and, consequently, in highly accumulated shoot DM. In contrast, appearing in quadrant IV these sources supplied at the dosage of 21 mg K dm−3 yielded the highest agronomic efficiency for K, Ca and S, in both cane plant and ratoon. In quadrant II KCl, regardless of the dosage, and the control, was clustered demonstrating the similarity among them. Finally, the absolute control is located isolated in the quadrant III, showing that non-application of these nutrients resulted in small uptake, poor shoot DM yield and agronomic inefficiency.

Conclusions

Treatments containing K, Ca, and S in the formulation showed high agronomic performance, for both cane plant and ratoon. In this regard, using PHY on sugarcane is an alternative source of these nutrients in a single granule compared to single K source application. Indeed, the combination of KCl and PYH performs better than each source alone for sugarcane farmers. Nonetheless, there is still a need for more research into PHY application management, with an emphasis on lowered rates, improved ratios, and precise timing of application for each nutrient. Future research into the profitability of using PHY under field conditions is required.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets of this study will be available from corresponding authors on genuine request.

Abbreviations

GYP:

Phosphogypsum

KIE:

Kieserite

KCl:

Potassium chloride

PYH:

Polyhalite

XRD:

X-ray diffraction

µ-XRF:

Micro X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy

References

  • Aguinis H, Gottfredson RK, Joo H. Best-Practice recommendations for defining, identifying, and handling outliers. Organ Res Methods. 2013;16:270–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112470848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ANDA (Associação Nacional para Difusão de Adubos). Anuário Estatístico do Setor de Fertilizantes. São Paulo: ANDA; 2017, p. 173.

  • Barbarick KA. Polyhalite application to sorghum-sudan-grass and leaching in soil columns. Soil Sci. 1991;151(2):159–64. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-199102000-00005.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbier M, Li YC, Liu G, He Z, Mylavarapu R, Zhang S. Characterizing polyhalite plant nutritional properties. Agri Res Tech Open Access J. 2017;6(3):1–9. https://doi.org/10.19080/ARTOAJ.2017.06.555690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardi ACC, de Souza GB, Vale F. Polyhalite compared to KCl and gypsum in alfalfa fertilization. Int Potash Inst. 2018;52:1–9. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.31860.24967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardo R, Lourenzani WL, Satolo EG, Caldas MM. Analysis of the agricultural productivity of the sugarcane crop in regions of new agricultural expansions of sugarcane. Gest Prod. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-530X3554-19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhatt R, Singh P, Ali OM, Abdel Latef AAH, Laing AM, Hossain A. Polyhalite positively influences the growth, yield and quality of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) in potassium and calcium-deficient soils in the semi-arid tropics. Sustainability. 2021;13:10689. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910689.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Box GEP, Cox DR. An analysis of transformations. J Roy Stat Soc: Ser B (Methodol). 1964;26:211–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1964.tb00553.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buyalov NI, Lepeshkov IN. Ozinskiv Potassium-magnesium ore deposit. Chem Abs. 1937;31:649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai J, Chen L, Qu H, Lian J, Liu W, Hu Y, Xu G. Alteration of nutrient allocation and transporter genes expression in rice under N, P, K, and Mg deficiencies. Acta Physiol Plant. 2012;34:939–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-011-0890-x.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan SY, Choo WS, Young DJ, Loh XJ. Pectin as a rheology modifier: origin, structure, commercial production and rheology. Carbohyd Polym. 2017;161:118–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.12.033.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Chen X, Jiao J, Zhang F, Chen X, Li G, Song Z, Sokolowski E, Imas P, Magen H, Bustan A, He Y, Xie D, Zhang B. Towards balanced fertilizer management in south china: enhancing wax gourd (Benincasa hispida) yield and produce quality. Sustainability. 2022;14(9):5646. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095646.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cloizeaux A. Des nouvelles recherches (Recent Investigations). Paris, Imp. Imperiale, 1867; p. 222.

  • CONAB. Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento (CONAB). Acompanhamento de safra brasileira: cana-de açúcar, terceiro levantamento Safra 21/22, novembro/2021 - Brasília: 2021. p. 63 .https://www.conab.gov.br/info-agro/safras/cana/boletim-da-safra-de-cana-de-acucar. Accessed in Feb 2022

  • Conti ME, Horra AM, Effron D, Zourarakis D. Factors affecting potassium fixation in Argentine agricultural soils. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 2001;32(17):2679–90. https://doi.org/10.1081/CSS-120000954.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cortese E. Sodium Sulfate in Sicily. Rass Min. 1922; 56:57–59

  • Cortez LAB. Sugarcane Bioethanol—R & D for productivity and sustainability. 1st ed. São Paulo Brazil: Blucher; 2010. p. 992 (10.5151/BlucherOA-Sugarcane).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordonal OR, Carvalho JLN, Lal R, de Figueiredo EB, de Oliveira BG, La Scala N. Sustainability of sugarcane production in Brazil. A review. Agron Sustain Dev. 2018;38:13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-018-0490-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos HG, de Carvalho Junior W, de Dart RO, Aglio MLD, de Sousa JS, Pares JG, Fontana A, da Martins ALS, de Oliveira AP. novo mapa de solos do Brasil: legenda atualizada. Rio de Janeiro: Embrapa Solos; 2011. p. 67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugast P. Use of polyhalite as a source of sulfur for oilseed rape and winter wheat in France. Int Potash Inst. 2015;43:21–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). Food and Agricultural commodities production. Country rank in the world, by commodity. http://faostat.fao.org/site/339/default.aspx. Accessed 19 Feb 2021.

  • Filho OJ. Calagem e adubação da cana-de-açúcar. In: Câmara GMS, Oliveira EAM, editors. Produção de cana-de-açúcar. Piracicaba: FEALQ/ USP; 1993. p. 133–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia A, Crusciol CAC, McCray JM, Nascimento CAC, Martello JM, de Siqueira GF, Tarumoto MB. Magnesium as a promoter of technological quality in sugarcane. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2020;20(1):19–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-019-00096-x.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gohil SJ, Mohandas VP, Joshi JM. India investigates new source of potash. Phosphorus Potassium. 1996;204:21–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoang MT, Duong MM, Truong TT, Ho HC, Pham VB. Agronomic efficiency of polyhalite application on peanut yield and quality in Vietnam. Int Potash Inst. 2016;47:3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoots HW. Geology of a part of western Texas and south eastern New Mexico with special reference to salt and potash. US Geological Survey. Bulletin 780; 1925, p. 33–126.

  • Kaler AS, McCray JM, Wright AL, Erickson JE. Sugarcane yield and plant nutrient response to sulfur-amended Everglades histosols. J Plant Nutr. 2017;40(2):187–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2016.1218024.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp SJ, Smith FW, Wagner D, Mounteney I, Bell CP, Milne CJ, Pottas TL. An improved approach to characterize potash-bearing evaporite deposits, evidenced in North Yorkshire United Kingdom. Econ Geol. 2016;111(3):719–42. https://doi.org/10.2113/econgeo.111.3.719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korndörfer GH, Oliveira LA. O potássio na cultura da cana-de-açúcar. In: Yamada T, Roberts TL, editors. Potássio na Agricultura Brasileira. 1st ed. Piracicaba: ESALQ/USP Associação Brasileira para Pesquisa da Potassa e do Fosfato; 2005. p. 469–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kudla J, Becker D, Grill E, Hedrich R, Hippler M, Kummer U, Parniske M, Romeis T, Schumacher K. Advances and current challenges in calcium signaling. New Phytol. 2018;218(2):414–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14966.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kurnakov NS, Bokii GB, Lepeskov IN. Kainite and polyhalite in the salt beds of the Soviet Union. Chem Abs. 1937;31:8451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwong KF. 2002 The Effects of Potassium on Growth, Development, Yield and Quality of Sugarcane. In: Pasricha B (Eds). Potassium for Sustainable Crop Production Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Role of Potassium in Nutrient Management for Sustainable Crop Production in India. Potash Research Institute of India (PRII) and International Potash Institute (IPI), Horgen Switzerland, 430–444

  • Manning DAC. Innovation in resourcing geological materials as crop nutrients. Nat Resour Res. 2017;27(2):11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-017-9347-2.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield GR, Lang WB. Government potash exploration in Texas and New Mexico. New York: American Institute of Mining and Metallurgical Engineers 212; 1929. p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCray JM, Rice RW, Ezenwa IV, Lang TA, Baucum L. Sugarcane Plant Nutrient Diagnosis. In: Rice RW, editor. Florida Sugarcane handbook. 1st ed. Gainsville FL USA: Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences; 2013. p. 128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medina NH, Branco MLT, da Silveira MAG, Santos RBB. Dynamic distribution of potassium in sugarcane. J Environ Radioact. 2013;126:172–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2013.08.004.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mello SC, Pierce FJ, Tonhati R, Almeida GS, Neto DD, Pavuluri K. Potato response to polyhalite as a potassium source fertilizer in Brazil: yield and quality. HortScience. 2018a;53(3):373–9. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI12738-17.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mello SC, Tonhati R, Neto DD, Darapuneni M, Pavuluri K. Response of tomato to polyhalite as a multi-nutrient fertilizer in southeast Brazil. J Plant Nutr. 2018b. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2018.1497178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mello SC, Pavuluri K, Pierce FJ. Polyhalite as a sulfur source for fresh market tomato production in Brazil. J Plant Nutr. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2019.1659325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mengel K, Kirkby EA, Kosegarten H, Appel T. Principles of plant nutrition. Dordrecht Netherlands: Springer; 2001. (10.1007/978-94-010-1009-2).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Molin SJ, Nascimento CO, Teixeira PC, Benites VM. Polyhalite as a potassium and multinutrient source for plant nutrition. Arch Agron Soil Sci. 2019;66(5):667–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2019.1631451.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira M, Macêdo G, Martins J, da Silva V, de Oliveira A. Mineral nutrition and fertilization of sugarcane. In: de Oliveira AB, editor. Sugarcane—technology and research. London: IntechOpen; 2018. (10.5772/intechopen.72300).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Paneque VM, Martinez MA, Gonzalez PJ. Study of potassium levels in three sugarcane varieties grown on compacted red ferralitic soil. Cultiv Tropic. 1992;13:5–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavinato PS, Corá JE, de Camargo AS, Herrera WFB, Pavuluri K, Pierce FJ. Sugarcane response to polyhalite fertilizer in Brazilian oxisols. Agron J. 2020;112:5264–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20452.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavuluri K, Malley Z, Mzimbiri MK, Lewis TD, Meakin R. Evaluation of polyhalite in comparison to muriate of potash for corn grain yield in the Southern Highlands of Tanzania. Afr J Agron. 2017;5(3):325–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poovaiah BW, Leopold AC. Deferral of leaf senescence with calcium. Plant Physiol. 1973;52(3):236–9. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.52.3.236.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • PVFCCo (Petro Vietnam Fertilizer and Chemicals Corporation). Polyhalite application improves Tea (Camillia sinensis) yield and quality in Vietnam. Int Potash Inst. 2016a;46:22–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • PVFCCo (Petro Vietnam Fertilizer and Chemicals Corporation). Polyhalite application improves coffee (Coffea robusta) yield and quality in Vietnam. Int Potash Inst. 2016b;47:12–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raij BV, Andrade JC, Cantarella H, Quaggio JA. Chemical analysis for fertility assessment of tropical soils [Análise química para avaliação da fertilidade de solos tropicais]. Campinas SP Brazil: Instituto Agronômico de Campinas—IAC; 2001. p. 285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Römheld V, Kirkby EA. Research on potassium in agriculture: Needs and prospects. Plant Soil. 2010;335:155–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0520-1.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos F, Borém A, Caldas C. Sugarcane: agricultural production, bioenergy, and ethanol. 1st ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc; 2015. p. 468.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute. The SAS system for Windows. Release 9.3. Cary NC: SAS Inst; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satisha GC, Ganeshamurthy AN. Bioefficacy of polyhalite application on yield and quality of cabbage and cauliflower. Int Potash Institute. 2016;44:3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schober JB. Über den Polyhalite in Berchestesgaden in Bayern. Rep Pharm. 1868;17:167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh A, Tiwari AK. Mineral nutrition in plants and its management in soil. In: Abbas Z, Tiwari AK, Kumar P, editors. Emerging trends of plant physiology for sustainable crop production. New Jersey: CRC Press; 2018. p. 281–96.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Soil Survey Staff. Keys to soil taxonomy. 12th ed. Washington DC: USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Serv; 2014. p. 401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spera ST, Reatto A, Martins EDS, Correia JR, Cunha TJF. Solos areno-quartzosos no Cerrado: problemas, características e limitação ao uso. 1st ed. Planaltina: Embrapa Cerrados; 1999, p. 48.

  • Steinhorst L, Kudla J. Signaling in cells and organisms—calcium holds the line. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2014.08.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stromeyer F. Mineralogical chemical Investigations on a new mineral salt. Jour Chem Phys. 1820;29:389–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari DD, Pandey SB, Katiyar NK. Effects of polyhalite as a fertilizer on yield and quality of the oilseed crops mustard and sesame. Int Fertil Corresp. 2015;42:10–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitorello VA, Capaldi FR, Stefanuto VA. Recent advances in aluminum toxicity and resistance in higher plants. Brazilian J Plant Physiol. 2005;17:129–43. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1677-04202005000100011.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yermiyahu U, Zipori I, Faingold I, Yusopov L, Faust N, Bar-Tal A. Polyhalite as a multi nutrient fertilizer—potassium, magnesium, calcium and sulfate. Israel J Plant Sci. 2017;64(3–4):145–57. https://doi.org/10.1163/22238980-06401001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Z, Chen K, Yu H, Chen Q, Wu F, Zeng X, Tu S, Qin Y, Meakin R, Fan X. Changes in tea performance and soil properties after three years of polyhalite application. Agron J. 2019;111(4):1967–76. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2018.06.0393.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by Sirius Minerals PLC, the Post-Graduate Program of Soils and Plant Nutrition (ESALQ-USP, Brazil), CAPES, Brazil (Coordenação de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior). COLCIENCIAS, Colombia (Colombian Department of Science, Technology and Innovation, 2014/call 646) supported the fellowship of the first author. We appreciate the collaboration of Sirius Minerals PLC for the fertilizers supply, especially to the researchers Dr. Kiran Pavuluri and Mr. Robert Meakin.

Funding

WFBH was supported by COLCIENCIAS (Colombian Department of Science, Technology and Innovation, 2014/call 646).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

WFBH devised the project, conducted the experiment, and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. BA performed the statistical analyses. HWPC supervised the µ-XRF analysis and PSP supervised the project. All authors contributed to subsequent revisions, read, and approved the final manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paulo Sergio Pavinato.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable. We did research on crop plant and did not handle animals along protected areas. Thus, no ethics protocol was required to be followed.

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests to declare.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1

: Fig. S1. Relative agronomic effectiveness (RAE) of potassium fertilizers in cane and ratoon crop of sugarcane. For the K reference fertilizer, the potassium chloride (KCl), RAE=100% (cross hatched bars). Vertical bars (T) represent the standard error of the means (n = 4). ns non-significant

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Herrera, W.F.B., Arruda, B., de Carvalho, H.W.P. et al. Improving potassium use efficiency of sugarcane through the use of polyhalite. CABI Agric Biosci 3, 55 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43170-022-00124-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43170-022-00124-4

Keywords

  • Agronomic efficiency
  • Balanced nutrition
  • Calcium
  • Magnesium
  • Potassium
  • Saccharum officinarum
  • Sulfur