- Data Note
- Open access
- Published:
Shifts in the rhizosphere microbiome and exudation profile of avocado (Persea americana Mill.) during infection by Phytophthora cinnamomi and in presence of a biocontrol bacterial strain
CABI Agriculture and Bioscience volume 4, Article number: 23 (2023)
Abstract
Background
Rhizosphere microbiomes are fundamental for plant health, development, and productivity, but can be altered by the incidence of soil-borne pathogens. The dysbiosis (disturbance of the microbiome structure of healthy plants) caused by these pathogens, combined with the recruitment of beneficial microorganisms by the diseased plant, may cause shifts in the rhizosphere microbiome during the infection process. These shifts are likely to be associated with changes in the rhizosphere metabolic profile, as the biochemical dialog, or crosstalk, between host plants and their microbiome is mostly mediated by root exudates. Our objective was to elucidate the shifts in the avocado rhizosphere microbiome and associated changes in the rhizosphere metabolome induced by the infection of the oomycete Phytophthora cinnamomi. We also evaluated the effect of inoculating a bacterial biological control agent (BCA) of P. cinnamomi on the avocado rhizosphere microbiome, in the presence and absence of the pathogen, and on morphological and physiological plant variables, to confirm the potential of the BCA to alleviate the stress induced by the disease.
Dataset presentation
Here, we present a novel dataset collected from a time-course experiment with four treatments: (1) control trees; (2) trees infected with P. cinnamomi; (3) trees inoculated with the BCA; (4) trees infected with P. cinnamomi and inoculated with the BCA. During the infection process, we measured plant morphological and physiological variables and collected rhizosphere soil samples for bacterial and fungal amplicon sequencing, bacterial RNA-seq and metabolomic analyses.
Conclusions
Collectively, our data elucidate the shifts in the avocado rhizosphere microbiome after infection by P. cinnamomi and when inoculated with a BCA, and help understand how a pathogen or a beneficial bacterium can alter plant-microbiome crosstalk. Understanding the effect of P. cinnamomi or a BCA on the avocado tree physiology and on the avocado rhizosphere microbiome and metabolome will direct our search for disease biomarkers or potential pathogen antagonists, help identify metabolites related to the recruitment of microorganisms, and assist us in developing integrated disease management strategies.
Background
The rhizosphere microbiome plays an important role for plant health and productivity (Bulgarelli et al. 2013; Trivedi et al. 2020). Rhizosphere microorganisms are involved in different processes such as nutrient acquisition, production of phytohormone-like molecules, induction of host resistance to biotic and abiotic stressors and competition with possible pathogens, which may benefit their host directly or indirectly (Méndez-Bravo et al. 2018; Lazcano et al. 2021; Syed-Ab‐Rahman et al. 2022). Microbial community structure in the rhizosphere depends on several factors, such as plant genotype and phenological stage, soil type and other environmental conditions (Philippot et al. 2013). Increasing evidence also shows that plants can recruit beneficial microorganisms to suppress pathogens (Liu et al. 2021; Thoms et al. 2021), thus modifying their rhizosphere microbiome upon infection. However, the molecular and biochemical pathways through which plants alter their associated microbiome when infected remain largely unknown, especially in non-model plants (Santoyo 2022), thus calling for future efforts to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of plant-microbiome interactions.
Changes in the rhizosphere microbiome induced by soil-borne pathogens have been demonstrated in different pathosystems. For example, the bacterial pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum modified bacterial community structure in the tomato rhizosphere and caused a decrease in the diversity of non-pathogenic bacteria (Wei et al. 2018). More recently, the plant pathogenic fungus Fusarium graminearum was shown to modify the rhizosphere microbiome in wheat, altering community structure and composition (Liu et al. 2023). Key bacterial taxa such as Stenotrophomonas sp. were detected in the rhizosphere of infected plants and associated with disease resistance, thus suggesting a “cry-for-help” strategy. The recruitment of a health-promoting microbiome by plants is most likely mediated through their root exudates, which are altered following pathogen infection (Rolfe et al. 2019; Liu et al. 2021). Linking the metabolic profile of root exudates with shifts in the rhizosphere microbiome of infected plants would thus improve our understanding of plant-microbe interactions and our ability to harness microbiomes for sustainable crop production (Pang et al. 2021).
Integrated management of diseases caused by soil-borne pathogens includes the use of microbial biological control agents (BCA) (Niu et al. 2020). Soil inoculation of BCA with demonstrated activity against soil-borne pathogens is expected to reduce the incidence of the pathogen population and limit its infective capacity. However, the effects of BCA application on soil and rhizosphere native microbiomes are not well understood. Previous reports showed that BCA inoculation modifies the structure of the rhizosphere microbiome (Li et al. 2021), enriching soil microbial communities in beneficial taxa with antagonistic properties against the targeted pathogen (Tienda et al. 2020; Zhu et al. 2023) or decreasing the interactions between the pathogen and other potential members of the pathobiome (Ahmed et al. 2022). These findings highlight the need to better understand how BCA inoculation may affect the rhizosphere microbiome of infected plants in order to elucidate underlying biocontrol mechanisms and possibly identify other beneficial microorganisms.
Our study focuses on avocado (Persea americana Mill.), a tree crop of great economic importance, in particular for Mexico, the world´s first producer and exporter (FAOSTAT 2021). Avocado production has been dramatically affected by the pathogen Phytophthora cinnamomi, causal agent of the disease known as Phytophthora root rot (Fernández-Pavia et al. 2013; Solís-García et al. 2021). Our objective was to determine the compositional and functional shifts in the avocado rhizosphere microbiome and the associated changes in the metabolic profile of root exudates during the infection by the oomycete P. cinnamomi. Moreover, we included a treatment with a bacterial BCA, with previously demonstrated antagonistic activity against P. cinnamomi in vitro (Méndez-Bravo et al. 2018; Cortazar-Murillo et al. 2023), to confirm the potential of the BCA to alleviate the stress induced by the disease in planta and to elucidate the effect of the BCA on the avocado rhizosphere microbiome, in the absence and in the presence of P. cinnamomi. Overall, our dataset offers an integral approach towards a better understanding of the effects of beneficial and pathogenic belowground interactions of avocado, a perennial tree crop, on its rhizosphere microbiome.
Dataset presentation
The experiment was established in a greenhouse at the Escuela Nacional de Estudios Superiores (ENES-Morelia) of the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Mexico, in March 2021. Ninety asymptomatic avocado trees of the « Mendez » variety, of approximately 2 years old, were purchased in a local nursery and acclimatized for three months in the greenhouse. The experiment consisted of four treatments: (1) control trees (C), not infected with P. cinnamomi, n = 30; (2) trees infected with P. cinnamomi (Pc), n = 30; (3) trees not infected with P. cinnamomi and inoculated with the BCA (B), n = 15; (4) trees infected with P. cinnamomi and inoculated with the BCA (BPc), n = 15.
Phytophthora cinnamomi strain TGR1-5, obtained from a Michoacán avocado orchard, was provided by Dr. Sylvia Fernández-Pavia (Universidad Michoacana San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Mexico). The BCA used in this study was the bacterial strain Bacillus sp. A8a (Méndez-Bravo et al. 2018). The thirty trees from treatments B and BPc were randomly selected and inoculated with 250 ml of a BCA suspension (1.5 × 108 CFU ml− 1). Two weeks later, trees from the Pc and BPc treatments were immersed in a bath containing a suspension of P. cinnamomi zoospores (4.9 × 102 zoospores ml− 1) for two hours. Trees from the C and B treatments were immersed in a water bath without zoospores of P. cinnamomi for the same duration. After the root immersion procedure, trees were transplanted in polyethylene bags containing a mixture of peat moss, perlite, vermiculite and original soil (3:1:1:1). One day after transplanting, trees from the B and BPc treatments were inoculated again with 250 ml of BCA suspension at the same concentration, to reinforce the presence of the beneficial bacterium at the root level after immersion.
Samples and measurements were taken at different times during the infection process: t0 (1 day after infection (dai) with P. cinnamomi), t1 (4 dai), t2 (7 dai), t3 (13 dai) and t4 (25 dai). At t4, trees from the Pc treatment presented a 100% incidence of wilt symptoms. At each sampling time, six trees from the C and Pc treatments, and three trees from the B and BPc treatments, were randomly selected to be measured and sampled. Plant morphological variables such as total number of leaves, number of wilted leaves, stem diameter and tree height, were measured for each tree at each sampling time (Data file 1). In addition, physiological variables such as stomatal conductance, photosynthetic rate and transpiration rate were measured as an average from two leaves of three selected trees, from 8 am to 11 am, and leaf water potential was recorded at 5 am and 12 pm, on each sampling day (Data file 1). Substrate humidity, pH (1:5 H2O) and electrical conductivity were also recorded at each sampling time (Data file 2). Moreover, soil total carbon (C) and total nitrogen (N) contents, and N-NH4+, N-NO3− and available phosphorus (P) concentrations were measured for soil samples collected at the initial (t0) and final (t4) times of the experiment (Data file 2). Total C and N contents were measured with a Perkin-Elmer 2400 CHN analyzer. The N-NH4+and N-NO3− concentrations were determined with KCl extractions (Anderson and Ingram 1993). Soil available P was measured following the Bray and Kurtz method (Bray and Kurtz 1945). Approximately 20 mg of rhizosphere soil samples (i.e., strongly adhered to the roots) were taken from the selected trees at each sampling time. Half of the collected samples were immersed in LifeGuard® Soil Preservation Solution (Qiagen) and stored at −80 °C for subsequent RNA extraction; the other half was kept at −20 °C for DNA extraction. Approximately 50 g of soil loosely attached to the roots were collected and frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80 °C for subsequent metabolomics analyses.
Genomic DNA extraction was performed with the ADN PowerSoil® and DNeasy PowerMax® Soil kits (Qiagen), following the manufacturer´s instructions. The libraries for the V3 and V4 regions of gene 16S rRNA (bacterial communities) were constructed following the protocol “16S Metagenomic Sequencing Library Preparation” of Illumina® (Set A Illumina), using primers reported in Data file 3 (bacteria). The same protocol was followed to construct libraries for the ITS2 region (fungal communities), using the mix of seven primers suggested by Tedersoo et al. (2014), as described in Data file 4. Purification steps were performed with ProNex® Size-Selective (Promega), following the manufacturer´s instructions. Two pools, one for 16S region and one for the ITS2 region, were sent to CD Genomics (Shirley, NY, USA) for sequencing on a Illumina® MiSeq platform (2 × 300 bp, paired-end). Bacterial and fungal sequences (Data files 3 and 4) were deposited in the Sequence Read Archive of NCBI under accession number PRJNA963057.
For bacterial RNA-seq analyses, rhizosphere soil samples were collected from C and Pc trees only. The RNA extractions were carried out with the RNeasy® PowerSoil® Total RNA Kit (Qiagen), following the manufacturer´s instructions. Subsequently, due to limited success in extracting RNA from all samples and low obtained RNA quantities, RNA extracts from different trees were pooled to obtain one RNA sample per experimental condition (C and Pc). RNA extracts were sent to CD Genomics (Shirley, NY, USA) for DNA depletion, ribosomal RNA remotion, library preparation and sequencing on a Illumina® platform (2 × 150 bp, paired-end). Transcript sequences (Data file 5) were also submitted to the Sequence Read Archive of the NCBI with the accession number PRJNA963057.
Rhizosphere soil samples for metabolomics analyses were processed and analyzed following the methodology described by Monribot-Villanueva et al. (2022). Briefly, soil samples were lyophilized for four to five days. Methanolic extracts were obtained using an accelerated solvent extraction system (ASE 350, Dionex, Thermo Scientific) and solvent was eliminated in the extracts with a rotatory evaporator (Büchi, RII). Dried crude extracts were analyzed by ultra high-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC, Acquity Class I, Waters™, U.S.A.), coupled to a high-resolution quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer (QTOF, HDMI Synapt G2-Si model, Waters™). Mass spectrometry analysis was performed with an electrospray ionization (ESI) source in positive and negative mode. Mass/charge ratios (m/z) and retention times data were acquired and processed with MassLynk (version 4.1) and MarkerLynk (version 4.1) software of Waters TM Corp. Data file 6 and Data file 7 correspond to positive and negative ESI databases, respectively.
A summary of the available data files is presented in Table 1.
Discussion and conclusions
Our dataset elucidates the shifts in the avocado rhizosphere microbiome after infection by P. cinnamomi. Previous reports have demonstrated that P. cinnamomi modified the structure and species composition of microbial communities in the avocado rhizosphere (Yang et al. 2001; Shu et al. 2019; Solís-García et al. 2021), affecting dominant taxa and their metabolic pathways. However, these reports did not investigate the functional implications of such changes, overlooking the possible shifts in microbial gene expression or plant-microbiome signaling pathways; combining metatranscriptomic (bacterial RNA-seq) data with plant physiological measurements and rhizosphere metabolomic information will help us understand how a pathogen can alter plant-microbiome crosstalk and unravel the critical role of plant-derived and microbial metabolites in disease mitigation by the plant microbiome (Berg et al. 2021; Pereira et al. 2023). Furthermore, the dataset compiled from this time-course experiment will provide insights into changes in host-associated microbial communities through disease progression, which have been previously demonstrated in other pathosystems, such as wheat infected by the fungal pathogen Zymoseptoria tritici (Seybold et al. 2020). Understanding the mode of action of P. cinnamomi, its effect on tree physiology and its impact on the avocado rhizosphere microbiome and metabolome could assist us in designing new tools for early disease detection and mitigation, for example through the identification of disease biomarkers or of potential microbial BCA.
As P. cinnamomi has been shown to be associated with a cohort of other opportunistic pathogens that collectively contribute to root rot (Vitale et al. 2012; Carranza-Rojas et al. 2015; Solís-García et al. 2021), our dataset will allow to identify the pathobiome, i.e., the set of microorganisms positively interacting with P. cinnamomi, and to gain a better understanding of microbial interactions in the rhizosphere through disease progression (Qiu et al. 2022). This information will be useful for future targeted isolation approaches aimed at investigating root rot-associated pathogens and developing integrated disease management strategies.
Finally, the addition of a BCA treatment in our dataset provides further information regarding the modulation of the plant rhizosphere microbiome by microbial inoculants (Berg et al. 2021) and confirmed the beneficial effect of strain Bacillus sp. A8a in planta. Understanding how BCA inoculation influences microbial community composition and exudate production in the avocado rhizosphere through time will allow us to develop novel strategies based on microbiome-engineering to enhance plant immune responses and counteract pathogen-induced dysbiosis. This is particularly important in export crops such as avocado, where current limitations to agrochemical applications call for more sustainable practices and integrated pest and disease management to maintain crop productivity (Stout et al. 2004; Guevara-Avendaño et al. 2022; Wangithi et al. 2022).
Availability of data and materials
The data described in this Data note can be freely and openly accessed on FigShare. Please refer to Table 1 for details and links to the data.
References
Ahmed W, Dai Z, Zhang J, Li S, Ahmed A, Munir S, Liu Q, Tan Y, Ji G, Zhao Z. Plant-microbe interaction: mining the impact of native Bacillus amyloliquefaciens WS-10 on tobacco bacterial wilt disease and rhizosphere microbial communities. Microbiol Spectr. 2022;10(4):e01471–22. https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01471-22.
Anderson JM, Ingram JSI. Tropical soil biology and fertility: a handbook of methods. 2nd ed. Wallingford: CAB International; 1993.
Berg G, Kusstatscher P, Abdelfattah A, Cernava T, Smalla K. Microbiome modulation—toward a better understanding of plant microbiome response to microbial inoculants. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:650610. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.650610.
Bray RH, Kurtz LT. Determination of total, organic, and available forms of phosphorus in soils. Soil Sci. 1945;59:39–46.
Bulgarelli D, Schlaeppi K, Spaepen S, van Themaat EVL, Schulze-Lefert P. Structure and functions of the bacterial microbiota of plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2013;64:807–38. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120106.
Carranza-Rojas Y, Morales-García JL, Pedraza-Santos ME, Chávez-Bárcenas AT, Morales-Motelongo KL. Aislamiento, identificación y patogenicidad de hongos asociados a la tristeza del aguacatero en Michoacán, México, In: Proceedings VIII Congreso Mundial de la Palta (Lima, Peru:ProHass). 2015;189–92.
Cortazar-Murillo EM, Méndez-Bravo A, Monribot-Villanueva JL, Garay-Serrano E, Kiel-Martínez AL, Ramírez-Vázquez M, Guevara-Avendaño E, Méndez-Bravo A, Guerrero-Analco JA, Reverchon F. Biocontrol and plant growth promoting traits of two avocado rhizobacteria are orchestrated by the emission of diffusible and volatile compounds. Front Microbiol. 2023;14:1152597. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1152597.
FAOSTAT—Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2021. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL/visualize. Accessed 5 Jul 2023.
Fernández-Pavía SP, Díaz-Celaya M, Rodríguez-Alvarado G. In: Phytophthora AG, Perspective K, Lamour, editors. Phytophthora in Mexico. Wallingford, UK: CABI; 2013. pp. 215–21.
Guevara-Avendaño E, Pérez‐Molina ML, Monribot‐Villanueva JL, Cortazar‐Murillo EM, Ramírez‐Vázquez M, Reverchon F, Guerrero‐Analco JA. Identification of antifungal compounds from avocado rhizobacteria (Bacillus spp.) against Fusarium spp., by a bioassay‐guided fractionation approach. Chem Biodiv. 2022;19:e202200687. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbdv.202200687.
Lazcano C, Boyd E, Holmes G, Hewavitharana S, Pasulka A, Ivors K. The rhizosphere microbiome plays a role in the resistance to soil-borne pathogens and nutrient uptake of strawberry cultivars under field conditions. Sci Rep. 2021;11:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82768-2.
Li J, Zhao Q, Wuriyanghan H, Yang C. Biocontrol bacteria strains Y4 and Y8 alleviate tobacco bacterial wilt disease by altering their rhizosphere soil bacteria community. Rhizosphere. 2021;19:100390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rhisph.2021.100390.
Liu H, Li J, Carvalhais LC, Percy CD, Prakash Verma J, Schenk PM, Singh BK. Evidence for the plant recruitment of beneficial microbes to suppress soil-borne pathogens. New Phytol. 2021;229:2873–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.17057.
Liu H, Wang J, Delgado-Baquerizo M, Zhang H, Li J, Singh BK. Crop microbiome responses to pathogen colonisation regulate the host plant defence. Plant Soil. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-023-05981-0.
Méndez-Bravo A, Cortazar-Murillo EM, Guevara-Avendaño E, Ceballos-Luna O, Rodríguez-Haas B, Kiel-Martínez AL, Hernández-Cristóbal O, Guerrero-Analco JA, Reverchon F. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria associated with avocado display antagonistic activity against Phytophthora cinnamomi through volatile emissions. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0194665. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194665.
Monribot-Villanueva JL, Altúzar-Molina A, Aluja M, Zamora-Briseño JA, Elizalde-Contreras JM, Bautista-Valle M, Arellano J, Sánchez-Martínez D, Rivera-Reséndiz F, Vázquez-Rosas-Landa M, Camacho-Vázquez C, Guerrero-Analco JA, Ruiz-May E. Integrating proteomics and metabolomics approaches to elucidate the ripening process in white Psidium guajava. Food Chem. 2022;367:130656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130656.
Niu B, Wang W, Yuan Z, Sederoff RR, Sederoff H, Chiang VL, Borriss R. Microbial interactions within multiple-strain biological control agents impact soil-borne plant disease. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:585404. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.585404.
Pang Z, Chen J, Wang T, Gao C, Li Z, Guo L, Xu J, Cheng Y. Linking plant secondary metabolites and plant microbiomes: a review. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:621276. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.621276.
Pereira LB, Thomazella DP, Teixeira PJ. Plant-microbiome crosstalk and disease development. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2023;72:102351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2023.102351.
Philippot L, Raaijmakers JM, Lemanceau P, van der Putten WH. Going back to the roots: the microbial ecology of the rhizosphere. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2013;11:789–99. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3109.
Qiu Z, Verma JP, Liu H, Wang J, Batista BD, Kaur S, de Araujo Pereira AP, Macdonald CA, Trivedi P, Weaver T, Conaty WC. Response of the plant core microbiome to Fusarium oxysporum infection and identification of the pathobiome. Environ Microbiol. 2022;24:4652–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.16194.
Rolfe SA, Griffiths J, Ton J. Crying out for help with root exudates: adaptive mechanisms by which stressed plants assemble health-promoting soil microbiomes. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2019;49:73–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2019.10.003.
Santoyo G. How plants recruit their microbiome? New insights into beneficial interactions. J Adv Res. 2022;40:45–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2021.11.020.
Seybold H, Demetrowitsch TJ, Hassani MA, Szymczak S, Reim E, Haueisen J, Lübbers L, Rühlemann M, Franke A, Schwarz K, Stukenbrock EH. A fungal pathogen induces systemic susceptibility and systemic shifts in wheat metabolome and microbiome composition. Nat Commun. 2020;11:1910. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15633-x.
Shu B, Liu L, Wei Y, Zhang D, Shi S. Differential selection pressure exerted by root rot disease on the microbial communities in the rhizosphere of avocado (Persea americana Mill). Ann Appl Biol. 2019;175:376–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/aab.12547.
Solís-García IA, Ceballos-Luna O, Cortazar-Murillo EM, Desgarennes D, Garay-Serrano E, Patiño-Conde V, Guevara-Avendaño E, Méndez-Bravo A, Reverchon F. Phytophthora root rot modifies the composition of the avocado rhizosphere microbiome and increases the abundance of opportunistic fungal pathogens. Front Microbiol. 2021;11:574110. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.574110.
Stout J, Huang SW, Calvin L, Lucier G, Perez A, Pollack S. NAFTA trade in fruits and vegetables. In: Huang SW, editor. Global trade patterns in fruits and vegetables. Washington, Distric of Columbia: United States Department of Agriculture; 2004. pp. 39–51.
Syed-Ab‐Rahman SF, Arkhipov A, Wass TJ, Xiao Y, Carvalhais LC, Schenk PM. Rhizosphere bacteria induce programmed cell death defence genes and signalling in chilli pepper. J Appl Microbiol. 2022;132:3111–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.15456.
Tedersoo L, Bahram M, Põlme S, Kõljalg U, Yorou NS, Wijesundera R, et al. Global diversity and geography of soil fungi. Science. 2014;346(6213):1256688. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1256688.
Thoms D, Liang Y, Haney CH. Maintaining symbiotic homeostasis: how do plants engage with beneficial microorganisms while at the same time restricting pathogens? Mol Plant-Microbe Interac. 2021;34:462–9. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-11-20-0318-FI.
Tienda S, Vida C, Lagendijk E, De Weert S, Linares I, González-Fernández J, Guirado E, de Vicente A, Cazorla FM. Soil application of a formulated biocontrol rhizobacterium, Pseudomonas chlororaphis PCL1606, induces soil suppressiveness by impacting specific microbial communities. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:1874. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01874.
Trivedi P, Leach JE, Tringe SG, Sa T, Singh BK. Plant–microbiome interactions: from community assembly to plant health. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2020;18:607–21. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-020-0412-1.
Vitale A, Aiello D, Guarnaccia V, Perrone G, Stea G, Polizzi G. First report of root rot caused by Ilyonectria (= neonectria) macrodidyma on avocado (Persea americana) in Italy. J Phytopathol. 2012;160:156–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0434.2011.01869.x.
Wangithi C, Muriithi BW, Diiro G, Dubois T, Mohamed S, Lattorff MG, Ngowi BV, Abdel-Rahman EM, Adan M, Kassie M. Synergies of integrated pest and pollinator management in avocado farming in East Africa: an ex-ante economic analysis. PLoS ONE. 2022;17:e0271241. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271241.
Wei Z, Hu J, Gu Y, Yin S, Xu Y, Jousset A, Shen Q, Friman VP. Ralstonia solanacearum pathogen disrupts bacterial rhizosphere microbiome during an invasion. Soil Biol Biochem. 2018;18:8–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.11.012.
Yang CH, Crowley DE, Menge JA. 16S rDNA fingerprinting of rhizosphere bacterial communities associated with healthy and Phytophthora infected avocado roots. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2001;35:129–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2001.tb00796.x.
Zhu Z, Wu G, Deng R, Hu X, Tan H, Chen Y, Tian Z, Li J. Spatiotemporal biocontrol and rhizosphere microbiome analysis of Fusarium wilt of banana. Commun Biol. 2023;6:27. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-023-04417-w.
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by project SEP-CONACYT (Programa Presupuestario F003) number A1-S-30794. We thank Silvana Martén-Rodríguez for facilitating the greenhouse at ENES-Morelia, UNAM; Sylvia Fernández-Pavia, Alejandra Mondragon-Flores and Marlene Díaz-Celaya for facilitating the P. cinnamomi strain and guiding us through the protocol for obtention of zoospores; Yareli Pérez Batista and Alejandro Méndez-Bravo for their assistance in the greenhouse experiment and RNA extractions; Eduardo Thome for his help with the extraction and quantification of genomic DNA at the Laboratorio de Genómica (ENES-Morelia, UNAM) and Sandra Rocha and Karla Tapia at the Laboratorio de Análisis Químicos de Suelos, Aguas y Plantas (Instituto de Ecología, A.C.) for their assistance with soil analyses.
Funding
This study was funded by project SEP-CONACYT (Programa Presupuestario F003) number A1-S-30794.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
FR, WD, JAGA, AMB, JLM and EAR designed the study. FR, EGA, IASG, FPG and AMB performed the experiment and collected the samples. MGM, EGA performed the DNA extractions and analyzed the amplicon sequencing data, supervised by FR, WD, VPC and EAR. AMB performed the RNA extractions. EGA, OMC, JAGA and JLMV performed the metabolomic analyses. FR, EGA, JAGA, AMB and JLMV wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Reverchon, F., García-Meléndez, M., Guevara-Avendaño, E. et al. Shifts in the rhizosphere microbiome and exudation profile of avocado (Persea americana Mill.) during infection by Phytophthora cinnamomi and in presence of a biocontrol bacterial strain. CABI Agric Biosci 4, 23 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43170-023-00167-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43170-023-00167-1