Skip to main content

Harnessing of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in agroecosystem sustainability

Abstract

Background

Soil microorganisms including rhizobacteria and fungi play a key role in soil health, biodiversity and productivity of natural and managed ecosystems. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) associated with plant roots enhance the uptake of nutrient and improve productivity. Similarly, mycorrhizal fungi particularly, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), form a mutualistic association with plants and enhance nutrients uptake and consequently promote plant growth and productivity.

Methods

Here we show how harnessing beneficial soil microorganisms like PGPR and AMF with their positive effect on plant development can contribute to the green and clean economic growth strategy.

Results

Through a review of the state-of -art knowledge in this area we demonstrate that this approach can improve uptake of nutrients, enhance plant growth, yield and tolerance to biotic and abiotic stress. We argue that this approach can reduce the need for agrochemicals that destabilizes the ecological system.

Conclusions

This review provides a state-of-the-art synthesis of the knowledge generated so far and insight into the multifunctional strategies employed by AMF and PGPR toward ensuring sustainable agriculture.

Background

The modern agricultural system is faced with two objectives, namely the need for more production of food to feed the growing world population and the need to reduce environmental damage (Jones et al. 2017). How these goals will be met is a great challenge to scientists. Food insecurity is an issue that needs serious attention due to climate change, soil infertility, increase in population growth, and scarcity of arable land for farming (Fasusi et al. 2021; Islam and Wong 2017). Over the past years, agrochemical (e.g., fertilizers, biocides, herbicides, etc.) have been widely promoted to increase food production and profitability of agriculture (Shuqin and Fang 2018). Chemical fertilizers help in improving nutrient deficiency in plants to improve plant productivity (Fasusi et al. 2021). The application of chemical fertilizers was reported by Itelima et al. (2018) to enhance several activities in the plants' roots because phosphorus, potassium, and nitrogen are important for plant growth and productivity. Nevertheless, its usage leads to loss of biological diversity, degradation of soil quality, and environmental pollution (Ramankutty et al. 2018). In addition, microbial diversity and the environment have been harmed due to an increase in the application of chemical fertilizers (Kumar et al. 2017; Nath et al. 2017). The application of chemical fertilizers did not only result in reduction in beneficial soil microbes’ diversity, but it has also caused health hazards due to leaching and environmental pollutions (Alori and Babalola 2018). Therefore, there is a need to employ an environmentally friendly and biological-based approach that enhance plant growth and yield (Gouda et al. 2018). There are many factors that can enhance crop productivity and nutrients availability in plants; this could be influenced by beneficial microorganisms that live in the plant’s rhizosphere (Teotia et al. 2016). Symbiotic interactions occur in the soil, which is beneficial in enhancing soil quality, fertility and increasing plant productivity. These interactions occur between the plant through the root system and the beneficial microbes that are present in the soil (Jacoby et al. 2017). For mutual interaction to occur between host plants and beneficial soil microbes that live near the plant root region through signaling pathways, the plant depends on the root system (Li et al. 2016). Some of the beneficial microorganisms that live in the rhizospheres and enhance plant growth include the genera Alcaligenes, Serratia, Azospirillum, Bacillus, Frankia, Rhizobium, Mycobacterium, Azotobacter, Gigaspora, Glomus, Acaulospora, Streptomyces, and Arthrobacter (Kehri et al. 2018; Meena et al. 2017).

Soil microbes perform an important function in improving soil fertility and cycling of nutrients to enhance plant development. AMF and PGPR are the main microorganisms present in the rhizosphere (Fasusi et al. 2021). In addition to improving plant development through nutrient uptake, these organisms also enhance plant tolerance to biotic and abiotic stress (Cabral et al. 2015; Ramakrishna et al. 2019). Through their symbiotic association with plants’ roots, AMF mycelia colonize plant roots of different species and form a mycorrhizal network to improve soil quality, plant growth, and plant tolerance to adverse conditions (Borde et al. 2017).

The use of AMF and PGPR as bioinoculant in increasing plant growth and ensuring sustainable agriculture has recently gained interest among researchers and policy-makers (Chatterjee et al. 2017). The application of AMF and PGPR in ensuring sustainable agriculture is becoming a new route to reduce the negative effect of chemical fertilizers. Although numerous studies exist on the use of PGPR and AMF in agriculture, the knowledge being generated has not been synthesized (Sagar et al. 2021). Substantial knowledge gaps also exist on the synthesis of PGPR and AMF in agriculture. Therefore, the objective of this review is to provide a state-of-the-art synthesis of the knowledge generated so far and insight into the multifunctional strategies employed by PGPR and AMF in ensuring sustainable agriculture.

Methods

Through a comprehensive review of the literature, this state-of-the-art synthesis and insight into the multifunctional strategies employed by PGPR and AMF toward ensuring sustainable agriculture. The literature review considered all types of relevant studies including those published in peer-reviewed journals, dissertations, and book chapters on the subject matter. We conducted the literature search using Google Scholar limiting the search to studies published in the English language covering the globe. We focussed the search on studies on the application of PGPR and AMF in ensuring agricultural sustainability. Accordingly, in the search engine we used various combinations of the following key words: Agricultural sustainability, beneficial microbes, mycorrhizal fungi, nutrients uptake, plant growth, plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and soil fertility. In total we found 163 published studies focussing on application PGPR and AMF in ensuring agricultural sustainability. We also found 16 studies providing practical effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) on plants under stress conditions. We confirmed and 9 studies providing information on mechanisms of action of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria that alleviate abiotic stress.

Synthesis

Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR)

The common rhizobacteria with plant growth-promoting potential are the PGPR that belongs to the phylum proteobacteria and firmicutes (Gontia-Mishra et al. 2017). Bacteria genera like PseudomonasAcinetobacterEnterobacter, Serratia, and Pantoea in the class Gammaproteobacteria also possess plant growth-promoting activity. Two free-living bacteria that belong to Betaproteobacteria have also been identified; these are Burkholderia and Achromobacter xylosoxidans (Batista et al. 2018). Plants that are associated with PGPR are Fabaceae, Poaceae, Asteraceae, and Brassicaceae. Fabaceae is a group of leguminous families that contain important plants like soybean (Glycine max), and root nodule formation in this plant is caused by its symbiotic relationship with nitrogen-fixing bacteria (Igiehon and Babalola 2018). Proteobacteria gram-negative bacteria are the dominant group of microorganisms in maize, rice, and Arabidopsis. The root microbiome varied among plant species because there is specificity in the type of bacteria that is associated with different plant species (Fitzpatrick et al. 2018).

PGPR is a crucial component of the soil, and they enhance the nutrients uptake by plants to promote their growth (Verma et al. 2017). Soil microorganisms are the determining factor of the status of soil and plant health richness in nutrients (Francioli et al. 2018). These microorganisms play a crucial function in the mobilization and solubilization of nutrients by enhancing plant development and suppressing the action of disease-causing pathogens.

(Nath et al. 2017).

Role of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR)

Nitrogen fixation

Nitrogen is among the vital nutrients required to enhance plant development because it is classified as a building block for plants, microorganisms, and animals (Moreau et al. 2019). The nitrogen fixation (Fig. 1) process by rhizobacteria involves the conversion of atmospheric nitrogen to ammonia, and it is catalyzed by an enzyme- nitrogenase (Choudhary and Varma 2017; Kuypers et al. 2018). The nitrogen fixation process can also be referred to as biological nitrogen fixation (BNF), which consumes a broad range of energy in the form of Adenosine 5’- triphosphate (ATP). There is variation in nitrogen fixation among different genera of bacteria. The group of genes that is responsible for nitrogen fixation in a plant is known as the nitrogenase (nif) gene, which is known to be present in nitrogen-fixing microorganisms (Mus et al. 2018). The nif gene was reported to consist of a structural gene that activates iron protein and other regulatory genes that are involved in the synthesis of symbiotic and free-living systems. Biological nitrogen fixation microorganisms include symbiotic and free-living nitrogen-fixing bacteria which include Herbaspirillum, Bradyrhizobium, Mesorhizobium, Rhizobium, Achromobacter, Frankia, Pseudomonas, Bacillus, Azoarus, and Azotobacter (Xu et al. 2017).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Strategic mechanisms employed by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria

Antibiotics production

Antibiotics production is the major mechanism that PGPR uses to overcome the negative effects caused by pathogens on plants (Alori and Babalola 2018). Antibiotics are compounds and some enzymes synthesized by plant growth-promoting microorganisms which inhibit the metabolism of plant pathogens, thus limiting their growth in causing plant diseases (Yadav et al. 2017). In the case where some plant pathogens develop resistance to a specific antibiotic, PGPR produces more antibiotics that will boost their ability against such pathogens. These antibiotics produced by PGPR can be biostatic or biocidal against plant pathogens (Katiyar et al. 2017). Recently, Pseudomonas and Bacillus were reported to produce different types of antibiotics such as subtilin, bacillaene, fengycin, sublancin, pseudononic acid, rhamnolipids, and cepaciamide (Alori and Babalola 2018).

Induction of systemic resistance (ISR)

PGPR promotes plant growth by inducing plant resistance to plant pathogens and the mechanism of inducing systemic resistance is active when there is an attack on the plant by pathogenic microorganisms (Nguvo and Gao 2019). The induced systemic resistance in plants is initiated by Microbes Associated Molecular Patterns (MAMPs) like PGPR. The main receptor which first perceives the Microbes-Associated Molecular Pattern is known as the Pattern Recognition Receptors (PRRs). Upon reception by PPRs, the ISR is being triggered by the plant, which results in a defensive response of the plant against phytopathogens attack (Villena et al. 2018). Colonization of Arabidopsis root by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens has been reported to promote plant development through modulation of root defense, which is enhanced by jasmonic acid (Asari et al. 2017). It was reported that Pseudomonas simiae improves systemic resistance against Mamestra brassicae when it switches on JA/ET- regulated ORA59- branched in replacement of JA-regulated MYTC2- branch (Basu et al. 2017). Similarly, Bacillus subtilis was reported to confer resistance against Fusarium oxysporum by inducing accumulation of metabolites in onion (Abdel-Rahman and Sonomoto 2016). Sclerotinia stem rot disease of soybean (Glycine max) was recently reduced using Trichoderma harzianum as a biocontrol agent by triggering the expression of a defensive gene within the plant (Zhang et al. 2016). Similarly, plants protection against Tobacco Mosaic Virus by Bacillus artrophaeus HAB-5 through the action of salicyclic acid, jasmonic acid, and ethylene-dependent signalling increases the expression of genes that enhance plant growth (Rajaofera et al. 2020). Therefore, PGPR is helpful in plant protection by improving the internal systemic resistance of plants to a pathogenic agent (Enebe and Babalola 2018).

Phytohormone production

Phytohormones are chemical messenger substances that are responsible for gene expression, cell division, and thus promotes plant growth. Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) as phytohormones that is produced by rhizobacteria are molecules that serve as an effector in the symbiotic association between plants and microorganisms, and it helps in the process of phytostimulation (Karthikeyan et al. 2019). The acquired IAA by the bacteria in the soil can alter the concentration of the IAA that is present in the plant (Manasa et al. 2017). IAA enhances plant growth by increasing the root surface to access the soil nutrients. The major functions that IAA performs in plants are cell division, elongation, cell differentiation, and increases the plant cell wall (Pholo et al. 2018). Auxin is among the phytohormones produced by PGPR. It is produced at the apex of the shoot and transported through the shoot to the apical meristem of the root; it also helps in root initiation and elongation (Olanrewaju et al. 2017). Another phytohormone that is produced by rhizobacteria is gibberellin. The major function of gibberellin is to activate growth processes in plants, including plant flowering, germination of seeds, elongation of the stem, and increase the rate of photosynthesis in plants (Vishal and Kumar 2018).

Siderophore production

Siderophore are small, high infinity iron chelating compound produced by microorganisms such as rhizobacteria especially under iron limiting conditions. Iron is among the nutrients that promote plant development. The problem caused by iron deficiency is a global issue that is affecting the production of crops on iron-deficient soil (Mahender et al. 2019). Iron occurs as Fe3+ ion where it forms hydroxide and oxyhydroxide in an aerobic environment, which makes it unavailable for the plant and microorganisms that may need it in the form of Fe2+ (Pahari and Mishra 2017). Fe2+ is acquired by bacteria through the secretion of siderophores. Fe3+ is reduced to Fe2+ when a complex membrane is formed by Fe3+ and siderophore; the Fe2+ is released into the cell by siderophore through a mechanism that links the membranes. The siderophore can be recycled during the process of reduction (Kashyap et al. 2017). Uptake of Fe2+ by a plant from siderophore producing bacteria is by uptaking Fe-siderophore complexes directly (Novo et al. 2018).

Hydrogen cyanide production (HCN)

HCN is a metabolite that reduces the growth of numerous microorganisms and also affects plant growth development (Gouda et al. 2018). HCN–producing rhizobacteria are effective biocontrol agents. PGPR that produces hydrogen cyanide secretes hydrogen cyanide synthases that break down the cell wall of pathogenic microorganisms (Bahadur et al. 2017). The rhizobacteria that produce HCN include Rhizobium spp., Aeromonas spp., Bacillus spp., Pseudomonas spp., Enterobacter spp., and Alcaligenes spp. (Tabassum et al. 2017). It was reported that most Pseudomonas spp. isolated from the rhizosphere of potato and wheat have the attribute of producing HCN when tested in the laboratory (Meena et al. 2017; Verma et al. 2017). The suppressive effect of diseases in rhizobacteria has also been attributed to the production of HCN. Rhizobacteria protect plants from pathogens by releasing HCN that can inhibit the growth of pathogenic microorganisms (Iftikhar et al. 2020). Recently, Zhai et al. (2018) reported that hydrogen cyanide-producing Pseudomonas putida 1A00316 was used as a biocontrol agent against Meloidogyne incognita egg collected from an infested tomato plant.

Phosphate solubilization

Phosphorus is among the important nutrients required for plant development (Mitran et al. 2018). The phosphorus that is available in the soil exists in two forms namely: the organic and inorganic, which are not available to plants, but through the process of phosphate solubilization by PGPR, phosphorus is made available for plant use (Etesami et al. 2017). Examples of microorganisms that act in this process are Pseudomonas spp., Agrobacterium spp., Rhizobium spp., Bacillus spp., and Enterobacter spp. (Alori et al. 2017). Production of mineral compounds like carbon dioxide, organic acid, inorganic acid, the liberation of enzymes, and OH are among the mechanisms that plant PGPR employ in solubilizing organic phosphorus (Khare and Yadav 2017).

Practical applications of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria

PGPR through mechanisms such as antibiotics production and ISR has been able to protect plants against pathogen attack (Rahman et al. 2018). Devkota et al. (2020) has reported the effect of inoculating pinus spp. with PGPR Bacillus velezensis to prevent the plant against Leptographium terebrantis and Grosmannia huntii that cause root disease and wood blue stain in Pinus spp. Similarly, the biocontrol efficiency of PGPR Bacillus subtilis MML2476 was recently reported to inhibit Rhizoctonia solani MML4001 and Fusarium solani MML4002 growth, fungi that cause rhizome rot of turmeric (Chenniappan et al. 2019). Production of secondary metabolites in the plant has been enhanced by PGPR. Plant inoculated with PGPR was reported to enhance the synthesis of secondary metabolites which increase the survival and competitiveness of plants. Among the secondary metabolites produced by plants are resin, volatile oils, flavonoids, alkaloids, glycosides, and tannins, which are successfully exploited for industrial purposes (Thakur et al. 2019) (Table 1).

Table 1 Effect of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria strain on plant growth

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and their interaction with plants

The essential characteristics of most plants are the symbiotic associations that occur between the beneficial soil fungi and the plant roots referred to as mycorrhizae (Rich et al. 2017). The structures formed by mycorrhizal fungi in the plant roots determine the classification of mycorrhizal fungi as endomycorrhiza or ectomycorrhiza (Balestrini and Lumini 2018; Smith et al. 2018). The symbiotic relationship between mycorrhizal fungi with plant roots is based on nutrient exchange in the plant root (Bhantana et al. 2021). In mycorrhizal symbiotic association, the fungus absorbs carbohydrates and lipids from the plant as a source of organic matter (Luginbuehl et al. 2017), likewise, the regulation of nutrients in the soil such as soil aggregation, survival of seedlings, and decomposition of organic matter are among the functions performed by AMF in the ecological system (Powell and Rillig 2018). The symbiotic association between mycorrhizal fungi and plants enhance plant tolerance to favorable and unfavorable condition and influences growth performance in plants, thereby increasing plant productivity (Santander et al. 2017). To balance the concentration of micronutrients in the plant tissue, plants develop some mechanisms that include modification of root structure and root exudates through their interaction with soil microorganisms, like the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Mahanty et al. 2017; Nanda and Wissuwa 2016). The dual functions performed by these fungi in the uptake of micronutrients by plants work either by increasing the absorption of micronutrients in a condition where there are limited nutrients or by preventing the accumulation of these nutrients by plant tissue when the soil is contaminated (Mnasri et al. 2017). AMF uses the mechanism of detoxification to reduce plant stress that is caused by excess micronutrients in the environment to enhance plant productivity. This makes AMF very useful in phytoremediation (Abu-Elsaoud et al. 2017; Bui and Franken 2018; Merlos et al. 2016). The absorption of micronutrients such as zinc, copper, iron, and manganese in a deficient condition and reduction in their accumulation under a toxic condition is achieved by AMF (Canton et al. 2016; Liu et al. 2018). The role played by AMF is dependent on the plant species that are involved. Recently, Rhizophagus irregularis has been reported to enhance the tolerance of a particular type of maize cultivar to copper, whereas, in another maize cultivar, it does not have any effect (Ruytinx et al. 2020). Elsholzia spledens, an indicator plant species of Chinese copper mining site, was reported to develop high adaptation to a copper that is available in high concentration in the soil as a result of its symbiotic association with AMF (Li et al. 2017). Plants that are colonized by AMF have the potential to develop an adaptation for a high concentration of zinc when compared to uninoculated plants without AMF. Examples of these plants are barley, maize, pepper, and soybeans (Ibiang et al. 2017; Watts-Williams and Cavagnaro 2018). The soil phosphorus concentration is the determining factor for the absorption of zinc by plants through their symbiotic association with AMF (Watts‐Williams et al. 2019). Recently, inoculation of Allium ampeloprasum transplanted plants with Glomus intraradices increased zinc concentration, and inoculation of pepper and tomato plants with mycorrhizal fungi increased the phosphorus and zinc concentration in a soil that was deficient in zinc and phosphorus (Tran et al. 2019).

Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) in alleviating abiotic stress in plant

Inducing drought tolerance

Drought tolerance in plants is among the effective tools used by AMF in ensuring sustainable agriculture that can result in food security (Cardoso et al. 2017). The mutual association between plant and AMF causes modification of plant root architecture, which includes the root length, lateral root number, and root density. This association provides an opportunity for the extracellular hyphae of the fungi in the rhizosphere of the plant to extend beyond the zone of depletion, therefore making it possible for them to absorb water and nutrients more easily in the environment where water is deficient (Sharma et al. 2017). Kumar et al. (2017) reported that when Pistacia vera was inoculated with Funneliformis mosseae and Rhizophagus intraradices in the greenhouse under drought conditions, it improved the uptake of minerals like phosphorus and zinc, and also provided a conducive environment to enhance the relative water content of the leaf. The absorptive surface area of the plants can be increased by mycorrhizal fungi. In a moisture-deficient soil, the nutrient that is taken up by mycorrhizal hyphae can increase plant growth, productivity, and amelioration of stress as a result of an environmental factor (Jamiołkowska et al. 2018). The symbiotic association of mycorrhizal fungi with plants also enhances their tolerance to water stress through the expression of plant physiology and plant genes (Mathimaran et al. 2017). Recently, it was reported that inoculated lettuce plants with AMF regulate the level of abscisic acid faster than non-mycorrhizal inoculated plants, by creating an adequate balance between the transpiration in the leaf and water movement in the root during water stress conditions (Volpe et al. 2018). Similarly, inoculation of pepper plants with AMF increases their drought tolerance by increasing the leaf relative water content and the percentage of non-wilted plants in mycorrhizal inoculated plants (Pischl and Barber 2017). Also in dry soil, Glomus mosseae and Glomus fasciculatum inoculation on lettuce plants increase acquisition of nitrogen when compared to control plant (Adamec and Andrejiová, 2018). PGPR has also found its application in promoting the tolerance of plants to drought. The mechanisms of production of IAA promote the tolerance of a plant to drought. Recently, Jochum et al. (2019) reported inoculation of maize and wheat with two PGPR strains, Bacillus spp. 12D6 and Enterobacter spp. 16i under water stress conditions. It was reported that these PGPR (Bacillus spp. 12D6 and Enterobacter spp) inoculations on the maize plant increased the root surface area, root length, and the number of leaves when compared to the control, while the result obtained from the PGPR inoculation on wheat increased the root branching and length when compared with the control. Similarly, the plant growth promoting potentials of Arthrobacter arilaitensis and Streptomyces pseudovanezuelae have recently been reported by Chukwuneme et al. (2020) to enhance physiological parameters in maize under drought conditions.

Inducing tolerance to salinity

The role played by AMF in enhancing plant tolerance to salinity has been highlighted in several research findings (Elhindi et al. 2017). Recently, it was reported that inoculation of grapevine rootstocks (Table 2) with Rhizophagus intaradices and citrus seedling with Funneliformis mosseae and Paraglomus accultum increased the growth parameters of grapevine rootstocks when compared to uninoculated plants (Feldmane et al. 2020; Zhang et al. 2017). The increase in performance of grapevine and citrus inoculated with AMF was attributed to a decrease in the amount of sodium, calcium and an increase in potassium and magnesium concentration in the leaf tissue of the plant (Saxena et al. 2017). Also, it was reported that olive seedlings inoculated with AMF strains (Funneliformis mosseae and Rhizophagus intraradices) improved nutrient uptake, salt tolerance, and increased the shoot and root biomass in the seedlings (Pollastri et al. 2018). The role played by Funneliformis mosseae on olive growth occurred due to an increase in uptake of potassium under saline conditions. Basil (Ocimum bacilicum L ‘Siam Queen) growth and tolerance to different salt concentrations were enhanced by Rhizophagus irregularis (Scagel et al. 2017). Similarly, plant tolerance to saline conditions when inoculated with AMF was demonstrated in tomatoes inoculated with Rhizophagus intraradices. There was an increase in uptake of potassium, phosphorus, and calcium in the plant which lowered sodium toxicity and increased the stomatal conductance as a result of improvement in the net photosynthesis, due to mycorrhization (Khalloufi et al. 2017). The increase in stomatal conductance shows an increase in the accumulation of phosphorus, copper, iron, and zinc in AMF inoculated plants when compared with uninoculated plants under controlled and saline conditions. AMF effect on the plant under salt stress conditions includes an increase in uptake of nutrients, potassium concentration and sodium ion ratio in the plant tissue, water use efficiency and photosynthetic in a plant (Saxena et al. 2017).

Table 2 The mechanisms of action of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) that alleviate abiotic stress

PGPR is beneficial to plant growth by enhancing plant tolerance to salinity. This was evident in the inoculation of maize (FH-1137) with a plant growth-promoting strain Bacillus spp. SR-2–1/1 increased the chlorophyll content, total phenolic content, and proline content in the plant (Rafiq et al. 2020). Also, inoculation of maize with Bacillus spp. SR-2–1/1 enhanced photosynthesis (RBCL) expression, antioxidants status (CAT1, APX1, APX2), and gene-related to homeostasis ion (NHX1, SOS1, H+-PPase and HKT1) in plants. Similarly, Egamberdieva et al. (2019) reported that a salt tolerance strain Bacillus licheniformis SA03 promotes Chrysanthemum growth by increasing its tolerance to salt stress. A recent study by He et al. (2018) reported a novel salt tolerance PGPR strain Pseudomonas spp. M30-35 characterized from Haloxylon ammodendron rhizosphere to contain 34 genes associated with plant growth promotion and stress tolerance.

Reducing effects of adverse soil pH

Plants are generally sensitive to changes in soil pH which can have either a negative or positive effect on their growth and development. As regards tolerance of AMF inoculated plants to alkaline conditions, it has been reported that there was an increase in morphology and biochemical responses in zucchini squash and cucumber inoculated with Rhizophagus intraradices over the control when subjected to pH 6.0 and 8.1 (Gupta and Shukla 2017; Rouphael et al. 2017). The AMF reduced the negative effect of the alkalinity on the yield by maintaining high content of chlorophyll in the leaf and also enhancing the nutritional status of the plant. Recently, research was carried out on the application of Funneliformis mosseae in enhancing Pyrus betulaefolia tolerance to high alkalinity (Yang et al. 2020). The role of PGPR in enhancing plant tolerance to alkaline stress was recently reported by Dixit et al. (2020). Dixit et al. (2020) reported that Bacillus spp. NBRI YN4.4 inoculated on maize under greenhouse conditions was reported to enhance its tolerance to alkaline stress and promote maize growth with a significant increase in photosynthetic pigment and soluble sugar content when compared with uninoculated. Similarly, PGPR Bacillus cereus and Pseudomonas fluorescens inoculation on wheat when grown in infertile sandy soil increased chlorophyll content, sugar content, and protein content in the wheat plant (Khan et al. 2019).

Removal of heavy metals

AMF uses several mechanisms in removing heavy metal contamination from the soil, such as dilution of the heavy metal, enhancing the synthesis of organic acid by plant roots to prevent heavy metal from entering the plant root and enhancing the retention of metal ions by their hyphae (Basu et al. 2018). It was reported that the glycoprotein produced by AMF (glomalin) helps in removing contaminants in heavy metal contaminated soil (Mishra et al. 2017). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi perform a crucial role in ensuring agricultural sustainability by reducing the negative effects of heavy metal contamination on plants, increases plant productivity by acting as bioprotectants, biofertilizers, and biodegrades heavy metals (Choudhary et al. 2018). Several findings have reported the tolerance of AMF to heavy metal toxicity on plants. A research study was carried out on celery inoculated with Glomus macrocarpum in soil with a high concentration of Cd. The AMF was able to reduce the negative effects of Cd, increase chlorophyll content, and improve plant growth (Yasmeen et al. 2019). AMF potential in improving plant tolerance to Cd was also investigated on Bromus kepotdaghensis when inoculated with Rhizophagus intraradices (Azimi et al. 2016). Similarly, cucumber plant inoculated with Funneliformis mosseae BEG107 in an environment with a high concentration of Cd and Ni increased the plant biomass by reducing the rate of movement of metal to shoot system of cucumber when compared with uninoculated cucumber plants (Rakshit et al. 2017). The success recorded from this finding was attributed to the fact that when AMF acquires a high concentration of phosphorus, it stimulates the metal-rich substrate. A study was also conducted on basil grown on soil with a high concentration of Cr, Cd, Ni, and Pb when inoculated with Rhizophagus intraradices, high increase in shoot biomass was recorded in the inoculated plant. The tolerance potential of the AMF to heavy metal contamination was attributed to the binding of extraradical hyphae to the metal which limits their translocation to basil plant root (Wu et al. 2019). Studies conducted on Solanum nigrum and switchgrass also revealed this binding activity of AMF (Guo 2019; Sun et al. 2020). Using the mechanism of siderophore production, PGPR help in the bioremediation of heavy metal polluted soil. Singh et al. (2019) reported the effects of PGPR strain Bacillus thuringiensis PS-1 and Azotobacter chroococcum PS-2 inoculation on garden pea in enhancing garden pea physiological and biochemical parameters such as chlorophyll content, number of pods, root length, and plant relative water content when grown in soil polluted with heavy metal.

Practical applications of AMF

Inoculation of plants with AMF results in the formation of wider extra radical hyphae within the plant root (Thirkell et al. 2017). Also, inoculation of plants with AMF and PGPR improves plant growth by increasing nutrient uptake in plants and increase plant tolerance to Sclerotium rolfsii (Mohamed et al. 2019). Plants inoculated with AMF can adapt to changes in climatic conditions. AMF symbiotic association with plants was reported to enhance the resistance of plants to phytopathogens. However, the molecular mechanisms attributed to the function of mycorrhizal-induced resistance are still unknown. (Han et al. 2019). Through modulation of oxylipin pathway, which is identified by an increase in agglomeration of vitamins such as folic acid and riboflavin, tomato plant inoculated with Rhizophagus irregularis and Funneliformis mosseae showed higher resistance to Botrytis cinerea and early blight diseases caused by Alternaria solani (Sanchez-Bel et al. 2016). Moreover, tolerance in mycorrhizal fungi inoculated plants has also been reported by Formenti and Rasmann (2019) to be mediated by jasmonate signalling Induced resistance in plants by mycorrhizal fungi is also mediated by hormonal crosstalk. The effect of potato inoculated with Rhizophagus irregularis MUCL 41833 was reported by Singh and Giri (2017) to enhance its defense against Rhizoctonia solani, thereby suggesting its involvement in the ethylene pathway. Additionally, it was also reported that AMF inoculation protects plants against herbivory (Sharma et al. 2017). This was reported in tomato plants when inoculated with Glomus mosseae, the larval performance of chewing caterpillar Helicoverpa arimigera was inhibited by activation of jasmonates pathway and inducing the expression of the genes that are responsible for plant defense such as LOXD, AOC, PI-I, and PI-II (Basu et al. 2018). The potential AMF in inducing plant resistance to pathogenic attack was also established in corn plant inoculated with Glomus mosseae, where it developed resistance against sheath blight diseases by increasing the acquisition of genes responsible for plant defense such as PR2a, PAL, and AOS (Enebe and Babalola 2019) (Table 3). The induced acquisition of defense-related genes such as OsNPR1, OsAP2, and OsMPK6 in rice inoculated with mycorrhizal fungi, enhances rice resistance fungus pathogen (Magnaporthe oryzae) (Basu et al. 2018). Attack of plants by phytopathogens is among the limiting factors that affect agricultural productivity.

Table 3 Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) on plants under stress conditions

Secondary metabolites production in plants is enhanced by the symbiotic association of AMF with plants. Research has now focused on isoprenoid metabolism as a result of AMF inoculation on plants. Upon inoculation of leguminous plants with mycorrhizal fungi, two cyclohexenone derivatives of carotenoid origin (mycorradicin and blumenin) are accumulated in the plant. In mycorrhizal inoculated plants, analysis of the biosynthesis pathway for mycorradicin was identified to increase the accumulation of 1-deoxy-D-xylulose 5-phosphate synthase (DXS) and1-deoxy-D-xylulose 5-phosphate reductoisomerase (DXR) which was an indication that the biosynthesis takes place through on- mevalonate methylerythritol phosphate pathway (MEP pathway). Similarly, flavonoids have been helpful in mycorrhizal-inoculated plants by controlling hyphae growth, root colonization, and hyphae differentiation. The effect of flavonoids is dependent on AMF species specificity. Two flavonoids, such as phytoalexin and medicarpin, were build up in mycorrhizal colonized roots. The symbiotic association of mycorrhizal fungi with the plant has also initiated the production of phenolic compounds in the plant, which is helpful in AMF symbiosis. Furthermore, medicinal plants inoculated with AMF have been reported to improve the concentration of essential oil (terpenoid).

Future directions in research and development

In agricultural management, AMF and PGPR were found to exert positive effects on plant nutrition and increase soil quality and nutrients. Though, the application of chemical fertilizers and land-use disturbance may reduce and harm their role of symbiotic association with plants (Trejo et al. 2016). Therefore, the use of plant PGP strains of rhizobacteria and AMF in the management of the agricultural practice is important in the application of AMF and PGPR inocula for future use to ensure agricultural sustainability (Backer et al. 2018; Mensah et al. 2015).

For global food security to be realized despite the increase in world population, sustainable agricultural practices are needed that will not harm the environment. To make the application of AMF and PGPR technology a better choice in ensuring sustainable agricultural practices, there is a need to have a better understanding of the metabolic pathways of AMF and PGPR with their symbiotic interactions with the host plants in the rhizospheres (Desai et al. 2016). Additionally, in having the understanding of the factors that are responsible for AMF and PGPR potentials in promoting health and productivity, there is a need to investigate molecular techniques behind the host-microbe interaction of these beneficial soil microorganisms (Ma et al. 2016). The development of a biological network that involves the use of different omics data can be achieved by creating a genome-scale model mimicking the state of metabolism of microorganisms (Imam et al. 2017). More importantly, the use of omics data as a biological network permits the integration of a large database and spotting/picking out some core genes that can be manipulated to promote the symbiotic association of beneficial soil microbes with the host plant. In manipulating the expression of the genes of interest in the microbes after the regulatory key genes have been identified, the gene-editing method such as TALENs (Transcription Activator Like Effector Nucleases) or CRISPR-Cas9 (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats, CRISPR/Cpf1 is performed (Fig. 2) (Gupta and Shukla 2017; Mosa et al. 2016). In addition to the integration of a systemic approach in promoting plant development, it is crucial to put into consideration the effect of environmental factors on beneficial microbes’ colonization in the plant. It is also needful to acquire more information on the positive effect and synthesis of beneficial microbe technology in promoting plant growth. Also, it is essential to have a well-documented knowledge and complete understanding to improve the technology for future application.

Fig. 2
figure 2

A schematic representation of the biological technology involves understanding the interaction of beneficial soil microbes with plants for ensuring sustainable agriculture

Conclusion and recommedations

In this review we have demonstrated that PGPR and AMF can provide low-cost, eco-friendly pathways to reduce the use of synthetic inputs such as fertilizers and pesticides which causes deleterious effect on human and environment.

In conclusion, it is important for scientists and researchers to focus more attention on the application of these beneficial microorganisms as microbial inoculants for biofertilizer production and usage, to ensure more food production, food safety, food security and agricultural sustainability that will meet food demand, of the increasing world population. The need to intensify more research study on the isolation, characterization of beneficial soil microbe with plant growth promoting traits will be beneficial in enhancing plant growth, yield and improving plant tolerance to abiotic stress is important. Increase in availability of these beneficial microbes and more awareness on its acceptances by farmers is recommended for ensuring agricultural sustainability.

Availability of data and materials

Not Applicable.

References

  • Abdel-Rahman MA, Sonomoto K. Opportunities to overcome the current limitations and challenges for efficient microbial production of optically pure lactic acid. J Biotech. 2016;236:176–92.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Abu-Elsaoud AM, Nafady NA, Abdel-Azeem AM. Arbuscular mycorrhizal strategy for zinc mycoremediation and diminished translocation to shoots and grains in wheat. PLoS ONE. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188220.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Adamec S, Andrejiová A. Mycorrhiza and stress tolerance of vegetables: a review’. Acta Horticulturae Et Regiotecturae. 2018;21:30–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akat H. Effects of mycorrhizal inoculation on growth and some quality parameters of Matthiola incana (L.) cultivation under salt stress. J Environ Biol. 2020;41:375–81.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alori ET, Babalola OO. Microbial inoculants for improving crop quality and human health in Africa. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:2213.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Alori ET, Dare MO, Babalola OO. Microbial inoculants for soil quality and plant health. In: Lichtfouse E, editor. sustainable agriculture reviews, vol. 22. Springer: Cham; 2017. p. 281–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amiri R, Nikbakht A, Etemadi N. Alleviation of drought stress on rose geranium [Pelargonium graveolens (L.) Herit.] in terms of antioxidant activity and secondary metabolites by mycorrhizal inoculation. Sci Horticulturae. 2015;197:373–80.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Asari S, Tarkowská D, Rolčík J, Novák O, Palmero DV, Bejai S, Meijer J. 'Analysis of plant growth-promoting properties of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens UCMB5113 using Arabidopsis thaliana as host plant. Planta. 2017;245:15–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Azimi R, Hossein Jafari S, Kianian MK, Khaksarzade V, Amini A. Studying arbuscular mycorrhiza symbiotic effects on establishment and morphological characteristics of Bromus kopetdaghensis in cadmium contaminated soil. Taiwan Water Cons. 2016;64:82–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Backer R, Rokem JS, Ilangumaran G, Lamont J, Praslickova D, Ricci E, Subramanian S, Smith DL. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria: context, mechanisms of action, and roadmap to commercialization of biostimulants for sustainable agriculture. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:1473.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bahadur I, Maurya BR, Meena VS, Saha M, Kumar A, Aeron A. Mineral release dynamics of tricalcium phosphate and waste muscovite by mineral-solubilizing rhizobacteria isolated from indo-gangetic plain of India. Geomicrobiology. 2017;34:454–66.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Balestrini R, Lumini E. Focus on mycorrhizal symbioses. Appl Soil Ecol. 2018;123:299–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu S, Rabara R, Negi S. Towards a better greener future-an alternative strategy using biofertilizers. I: plant growth promoting bacteria. Plant Gene. 2017;12:43–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu S, Rabara RC, Negi S. AMF: the future prospect for sustainable agriculture. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 2018;102:36–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batista BD, Lacava PT, Ferrari A, Teixeira-Silva NS, Bonatelli ML, Tsui S, Mondin M, Kitajima EW, Pereira JO, Azevedo JL. Screening of tropically derived, multi-trait plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and evaluation of corn and soybean colonization ability. Microbiol Res. 2018;206:33–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardo L, Carletti P, Badeck FW, Rizza F, Morcia C, Ghizzoni R, Rouphael Y, Colla G, Terzi V, Lucini L. Metabolomic responses triggered by arbuscular mycorrhiza enhance tolerance to water stress in wheat cultivars. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2019;137:203–12.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bhantana P, Rana MS, Sun X, Moussa MG, Saleem MH, Syaifudin M, Shah A, Poudel A, Pun AB, Bhat MA. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and its major role in plant growth, zinc nutrition, phosphorous regulation and phytoremediation. Symbiosis. 2021;84:19–37.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Borde M, Dudhane M, Kulkarni M. Role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) in salinity tolerance and growth response in plants under salt stress conditions’. In: Varma A, Prasad R, Tuteja N, editors. Mycorrhiza-eco-physiology, secondary metabolites, nanomaterials. Cham: Springer; 2017. p. 71–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bui VC, Franken P. Acclimatization of Rhizophagus irregularis enhances Zn tolerance of the fungus and the mycorrhizal plant partner. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:3156.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cabral L, Soares CRFS, Giachini AJ, Siqueira JO. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in phytoremediation of contaminated areas by trace elements: mechanisms and major benefits of their applications. W J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;31:1655–64.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Canton GC, Bertolazi AA, Cogo AJ, Eutrópio FJ, Melo J, de Souza SB, Krohling CA, Campostrini E, da Silva AG, Façanha AR. Biochemical and ecophysiological responses to manganese stress by ectomycorrhizal fungus Pisolithus tinctorius and in association with Eucalyptus grandis. Mycorrhiza. 2016;26:475–87.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso EJ, Nogueira MA, Zangaro W. Importance of mycorrhizae in tropical soils. In: de Azevedo J, Quecine M, editors. Diversity and benefits of microorganisms from the tropics. Cham: Springer; 2017. p. 245–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee R, Roy A, Thirumdasu RK. Microbial inoculants in organic vegetable production: current perspective. In: Zaidi A, Khan M, editors. Microbial strategies for vegetable production. Springer: Cham; 2017. p. 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chenniappan C, Narayanasamy M, Daniel G, Ramaraj G, Ponnusamy P, Sekar J, Ramalingam PV. ’Biocontrol efficiency of native plant growth promoting rhizobacteria against rhizome rot disease of turmeric. Biol Cont. 2019;129:55–64.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Choudhary DK, Varma A. Nitrogenase (a key enzyme): structure and function. In: Hansen A, Choudhary D, Agrawal P, Varma A, editors. Rhizobium biology and biotechnology, vol. 50. Cham: Springer; 2017. p. 293–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choudhary M, Ghasal PC, Yadav RP, Meena VS, Mondal T, Bisht J. Towards plant-beneficiary rhizobacteria and agricultural sustainability. In: Meena VS, editor. Role of rhizospheric microbes in soil. Singapore: Springer; 2018. p. 1–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chukwuneme CF, Babalola OO, Kutu FR, Ojuederie OB. Characterization of actinomycetes isolates for plant growth promoting traits and their effects on drought tolerance in maize. J Plant Inter. 2020;15:93–105.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Da Jeong Shin SJY, Hong JK, Weon HY, Song J, Sang MK. Effect of Bacillus aryabhattai H26–2 and B. siamensis H30–3 on growth promotion and alleviation of heat and drought stresses in Chinese cabbage. Plant Pathol. 2019;35:178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desai S, Kumar GP, Amalraj LD, Bagyaraj D, Ashwin R. Exploiting PGPR and AMF biodiversity for plant health management. In: Singh DP, Singh HB, Prabha R, editors. Microbial inoculants in sustainable agricultural productivity. New Delhi: Springer; 2016. p. 145–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devkota P, Kloepper JW, Enebak SA, Eckhardt LG. Towards biocontrol of ophiostomatoid fungi by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Biocontrol Sci Tech. 2020;30:19–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimkpa CO, Merten D, Svatoš A, Büchel G, Kothe E. Metal-induced oxidative stress impacting plant growth in contaminated soil is alleviated by microbial siderophores. Soil Biol Biochem. 2009;41:154–62.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit VK, Misra S, Mishra SK, Tewari SK, Joshi N, Chauhan PS. Characterization of plant growth-promoting alkalotolerant Alcaligenes and Bacillus strains for mitigating the alkaline stress in Zea mays. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-020-01399-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Egamberdieva D, Wirth S, Bellingrath-Kimura SD, Mishra J, Arora NK. Salt-tolerant plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for enhancing crop productivity of saline soils. Front Microbiol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02791.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Elhindi KM, El-Din AS, Elgorban AM. The impact of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in mitigating salt-induced adverse effects in sweet basil (Ocimum basilicum L.). Saudi J Biol Sci. 2017;24:170–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Enebe MC, Babalola OO. The influence of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in plant tolerance to abiotic stress: a survival strategy. Appl Microbio Biotechnol. 2018;102:7821–35.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Enebe MC, Babalola OO. The impact of microbes in the orchestration of plants’ resistance to biotic stress: a disease management approach. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2019;103:9–25.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Etesami H, Emami S, Alikhani HA. 2017, ’Potassium solubilizing bacteria (KSB): mechanisms, promotion of plant growth, and future prospects a review. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2017;17:897–911.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fasusi OA, Cruz C, Babalola OO. Agricultural sustainability: microbial biofertilizers in rhizosphere management. Agriculture. 2021;2012(11):163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldmane D, Druva-Lūsīte I, Pole V, Butac MM, Militaru M, Missa I, Meiere D, Rubauskis E. Rhizophagus irregularis MUCL 41,833 association with green cuttings of Prunus sp Rootstocks. Plant Growth Regul. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-020-10116-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick CR, Copeland J, Wang PW, Guttman DS, Kotanen PM, Johnson MT. Assembly and ecological function of the root microbiome across angiosperm plant species. Proc National Academy Sci. 2018;115:E1157–65.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Formenti L, Rasmann S. Mycorrhizal fungi enhance resistance to herbivores in tomato plants with reduced jasmonic acid production. Agronomy. 2019;9:131.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Francioli D, Schulz E, Buscot F, Reitz T. Dynamics of soil bacterial communities over a vegetation season relate to both soil nutrient status and plant growth phenology. Microbial Ecol. 2018;75:216–27.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goicoechea N, Bettoni MM, Fuertes-Mendizabal T, González-Murua C, Aranjuelo I. 2016, Durum wheat quality traits affected by mycorrhizal inoculation, water availability and atmospheric CO2 concentration. Crop and Pasture Sci. 2016;67:147–55.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gouda S, Kerry RG, Das G, Paramithiotis S, Shin HS, Patra JK. Revitalization of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for sustainable development in agriculture. Microbiol Res. 2018;206:131–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guo X. The role of arbuscular mycorrhiza in sustainable environment and agriculture. In: Giri B, Prasad R, Wu QS, Varma A, editors. Biofertilizers for sustainable agriculture and environment, vol. 55. Springer: Cham; 2019. p. 501–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta SK, Shukla P. Gene editing for cell engineering: trends and applications. Critical Reviews in Biotechnol. 2017;37:672–84.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Han G, Cheng C, Zheng Y, Wang X, Xu Y, Wang W, Zhu S, Cheng B. Identification of long non-coding RNAs and the regulatory network responsive to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi colonization in maize roots. Intern J Mol Sci. 2019;20:4491.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • He AL, Niu SQ, Zhao Q, Li YS, Gou JY, Gao HJ, Suo SZ, Zhang JL. Induced salt tolerance of perennial ryegrass by a novel bacterium strain from the rhizosphere of a desert shrub Haloxylon ammodendron. Interl J Mol Sci. 2018;19:469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibiang YB, Mitsumoto H, Sakamoto K. Bradyrhizobia and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi modulate manganese, iron, phosphorus, and polyphenols in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) under excess zinc. Environ Exper Bot. 2017;137:1–13.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Iftikhar Y, Sajid A, Shakeel Q, Ahmad Z, Haq ZU. Biological antagonism: a safe and sustainable way to manage plant diseases. In: Haq UI, editor. Plant disease management strategies for sustainable agriculture through traditional and modern approaches. Cham: Springer; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Igiehon NO, Babalola OO. Rhizosphere microbiome modulators: contributions of nitrogen fixing bacteria towards sustainable agriculture. Intern J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15:574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imam J, Shukla P, Prasad Mandal N, Variar M. Microbial interactions in plants: perspectives and applications of proteomics. Current Protein and Peptide Sci. 2017;18:956–65.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Imane O, Atmane R, el Yacoubi H, Sara EC, Younes A. 'Potentiality exploration of native arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in Argania spinosa (L.) skeels growth under nursery nonditions. Plant Cell Biotechnol Mol Biol. 2019;2019:1320–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam MS, Wong AT. Climate change and food in/security: a critical nexus. Environments. 2017;4:38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Itelima J, Bang W, Onyimba I, Oj E. A review: biofertilizer; a key player in enhancing soil fertility and crop productivity. Microbiol Biotechnol Report. 2018;2018(2):22–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby R, Peukert M, Succurro A, Koprivova A, Kopriva S. The role of soil microorganisms in plant mineral nutrition—current knowledge and future directions. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:1617.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jamiołkowska A, Księżniak A, Gałązka A, Hetman B, Kopacki M, kwaryło-Bednarz B. Impact of abiotic factors on development of the community of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the soil: a review. Intern Agrophy. 2018;32:133–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jochum M, McWilliams KM, Borrego E, Kolomiets M, Niu G, Pierson E, Jo YK. Bioprospecting Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria that mitigate drought stress in grasses. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:2106.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jones JW, Antle JM, Basso B, Boote KJ, Conant RT, Foster I, Godfray HCJ, Herrero M, Howitt RE, Janssen S. Brief history of agricultural systems modeling. Agric Syst. 2017;155:240–54.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kamayestani A, Rezaei M, Sarkhosh A, Asghari HR. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi ('Glomus mosseae’) on growth enhancement and nutrient (NPK) uptake of three grape ('Vitis vinifera’L.) cultivars under three different water deficit levels. Australian J Crop Sci. 2019;13:1401.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kang SM, Khan AL, Waqas M, Asaf S, Lee KE, Park YG. Integrated phytohormone production by the plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium Bacillus tequilensis SSB07 induced thermotolerance in soybean. J Plant Inter. 2019;14:416–23.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karthikeyan G, Rajendran L, Suganyadevi M, Raguchander T. Microbial rhizobacteria-mediated signalling and plant growth promotion. In: Jogaiah S, Abdelrahman M, editors. Bioactive molecules in plant defense. Springer: Cham; 2019. p. 35–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kashyap AS, Pandey VK, Manzar N, Kannojia P, Singh UB, Sharma P. Role of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria for improving crop productivity in sustainable agriculture. In: Singh D, Singh H, Prabha R, editors. Plant-microbe interactions in agro-ecological perspectives. Springer: Singapore; 2017. p. 673–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katiyar D, Hemantaranjan A, Singh B. Application of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in promising agriculture: an appraisal. J Plant Physiol Pathol. 2017;4:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ke X, Feng S, Wang J, Lu W, Zhang W, Chen ML. 'Effect of inoculation with nitrogen-fixing bacterium Pseudomonas stutzeri A1501 on maize plant growth and the microbiome indigenous to the rhizosphere. Systematic Appl Microbiol. 2019;42:248–60.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kehri HK, Akhtar O, Zoomi I, Pandey D. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: taxonomy and its systematics. Intern J Life Sci Res. 2018;6:58–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalloufi M, Martínez-Andújar C, Lachaâl M, Karray-Bouraoui N, Pérez-Alfocea F, Albacete A. The interaction between foliar GA3 application and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculation improves growth in salinized tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) plants by modifying the hormonal balance. J Plant Physiol. 2017;214:134–44.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khan SW, Yaseen T, Naz F, Abidullah S, Kamil M. Influence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) inoculation on growth and mycorrhizal dependency of (Lens culinaris L.) varieties. Intern J Bioorganic Chem. 2019;4:47–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khare E, Yadav A. The role of microbial enzyme systems in plant growth promotion. Climate Change Environ Sust. 2017;5:122–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khosravifar S, Farahvash F, Aliasgharzad N, Yarnia M, Khoei FR. Effects of different irrigation regimes and two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on some physiological characteristics and yield of potato under field conditions. J Plant Nutr. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2020.1758133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kılıç D, Cangi R. The effects on final take and root quality of mychorrizal preparations in grafted vine sapling production. Turkish J Agri Food Sci Technol. 2019;7:2121–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar M, Bauddh K, Sainger M, Sainger PA, Singh RP. Increase in growth, productivity and nutritional status of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and enrichment in soil microbial population applied with biofertilizers entrapped with organic matrix. J Plant Nutrition. 2015;38:260–76.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Singh R, Adholeya A. Biotechnological advancements in industrial production of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: achievements, challenges, and future prospects. In: Satyanarayana T, Deshmukh S, Johri B, editors. Developments in fungal biology and applied mycology. Singapore: Springer; 2017. p. 413–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuypers MM, Marchant HK, Kartal B. The microbial nitrogen-cycling network. Nature Rev Microbiol. 2018;16:263.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li G, Kronzucker HJ, Shi W. The response of the root apex in plant adaptation to iron heterogeneity in soil. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:344.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Liang H, Yan M, Chen L, Zhang H, Liu J, Wang S, Jin Z. Arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi facilitate rapid adaptation of Elsholtzia splendens to copper. Sci Total Environ. 2017;599:1462–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liu L, Li J, Yue F, Yan X, Wang F, Bloszies S, Wang Y. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculation and biochar amendment on maize growth, cadmium uptake and soil cadmium speciation in Cd-contaminated soil. Chemosphere. 2018;194:495–503.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Xu X, Fu H, Zhao M, Chen W. Effects of microbial fertilizer on apple fruit quality. IOP Conf Series Earth Environ Sci. 2020;446: 032102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luginbuehl LH, Menard GN, Kurup S, Van Erp H, Radhakrishnan GV, Breakspear A, Oldroyd GE, Eastmond PJ. Fatty acids in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi are synthesized by the host plant. Science. 2017;356:1175–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ma Y, Oliveira RS, Freitas H, Zhang C. Biochemical and molecular mechanisms of plant-microbe-metal interactions: relevance for phytoremediation. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:918.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Madende M, Hayes M. Fish by-product use as biostimulants: an overview of the current state of the art, Including relevant legislation and regulations within the EU and USA. Molecules. 2020;25:1122.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mahanty T, Bhattacharjee S, Goswami M, Bhattacharyya P, Das B, Ghosh A, Tribedi P. Biofertilizers: a potential approach for sustainable agriculture development. Environ Sci Poll Res. 2017;24:3315–35.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mahender A, Swamy B, Anandan A, Ali J. Tolerance of iron-deficient and-toxic soil conditions in rice. Plants. 2019;8:31.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Manasa K, Reddy S, Triveni S. Characterization of potential PGPR and antagonistic activities of Rhizobium isolates from different rhizosphere soils. J Pharmac Phytochem. 2017;6:51–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathimaran N, Sharma MP, Mohan Raju B, Bagyaraj D. Mycosphere Essay 17 Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis and drought tolerance in crop plants. Mycosphere. 2017;8:361–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathur S, Sharma MP, Jajoo A. Improved photosynthetic efficacy of maize (Zea mays) plants with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) under high temperature stress. J Photochemistry Photobiol Biol. 2018;180:149–54.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meena M, Swapnil P, Zehra A, Aamir M, Dubey MK, Goutam J, Upadhyay R. Beneficial microbes for disease suppression and plant growth promotion. In: Singh D, Singh H, Prabha R, editors. Plant-microbe interactions in agro-ecological perspectives. Springer: Singapore; 2017. p. 395–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mensah JA, Koch AM, Antunes PM, Kiers ET, Hart M, Bücking H. High functional diversity within species of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi is associated with differences in phosphate and nitrogen uptake and fungal phosphate metabolism. Mycorrhiza. 2015;25:533–46.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Merlos MA, Zitka O, Vojtech A, Azcón-Aguilar C, Ferrol N. The arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Rhizophagus irregularis differentially regulates the copper response of two maize cultivars differing in copper tolerance. Plant Sci. 2016;253:68–76.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra J, Singh R, Arora NK. Alleviation of heavy metal stress in plants and remediation of soil by rhizosphere microorganisms. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1706.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mitran T, Meena RS, Lal R, Layek J, Kumar S, Datta R. Role of soil phosphorus on legume production. In: Meena R, Das A, Yadav G, Lal R, editors. Legumes for soil health and sustainable management. Springer: Singapore; 2018. p. 487–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mnasri M, Janoušková M, Rydlová J, Abdelly C, Ghnaya T. Comparison of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal effects on the heavy metal uptake of a host and a non-host plant species in contact with extraradical mycelial network. Chemosphere. 2017;171:476–84.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mohamed I, Eid KE, Abbas MH, Salem AA, Ahmed N, Ali M, Shah GM, Fang C. Use of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and mycorrhizae to improve the growth and nutrient utilization of common bean in a soil infected with white rot fungi. Ecotoxicol Environ Safety. 2019;171:539–48.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moreau D, Bardgett RD, Finlay RD, Jones DL, Philippot L. A plant perspective on nitrogen cycling in the rhizosphere. Funct Ecol. 2019;33:540–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosa KA, Saadoun I, Kumar K, Helmy M, Dhankher OP. Potential biotechnological strategies for the cleanup of heavy metals and metalloids. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:303.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mus F, Alleman AB, Pence N, Seefeldt LC, Peters JW. Exploring the alternatives of biological nitrogen fixation. Metallomics. 2018;10:523–38.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Namwongsa J, Jogloy S, Vorasoot N, Boonlue S, Riddech N, Mongkolthanaruk W. ’Endophytic bacteria improve root traits, biomass and yield of Helianthus tuberosus L. Under normal and deficit water conditions. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2019;29:1777–89.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nanda AK, Wissuwa M. Rapid crown root development confers tolerance to zinc deficiency in rice. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:428.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Nath CP, Das TK, Rana KS, Bhattacharyya R, Pathak H, Paul S, Meena MC, Singh SB. Greenhouse gases emission, soil organic carbon and wheat yield as affected by tillage systems and nitrogen management practices. Archives of Agro Soil Sci. 2017;63:1644–60.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nguvo KJ, Gao X. Weapons hidden underneath: bio-control agents and their potentials to activate plant induced systemic resistance in controlling crop Fusarium diseases. J Plant Disea and Prot. 2019;126:177–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novo LA, Castro PM, Alvarenga P, da Silva EF. Plant growth–promoting rhizobacteria-assisted phytoremediation of mine soils. Bio-Geotechnol Mine Site Rehab. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812986-9.00016-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olanrewaju OS, Glick BR, Babalola OO. Mechanisms of action of plant growth promoting bacteria. W J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-017-2364-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahari A, Mishra B. Characterization of siderophore producing rhizobacteria and its effect on growth performance of different vegetables. Intern J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2017;6:1398–405.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pholo M, Coetzee B, Maree HJ, Young PR, Lloyd JR, Kossmann J, Hills PN. Cell division and turgor mediate enhanced plant growth in Arabidopsis plants treated with the bacterial signalling molecule lumichrome. Planta. 2018;248:477–88.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pischl PH, Barber NA. Plant responses to arbuscular mycorrhizae under elevated temperature and drought. J Plant Ecol. 2017;10:692–701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollastri S, Savvides A, Pesando M, Lumini E, Volpe MG, Ozudogru EA, Faccio A, De Cunzo F, Michelozzi M, Lambardi M. Impact of two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on Arundo donax L. response to salt stress. Planta. 2018;247:573–85.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Powell JR, Rillig MC. Biodiversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and ecosystem function. New Phytol. 2018;220:1059–75.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rabiey M, Roy SR, Holtappels D, Franceschetti L, Quilty BJ, Creeth R, Sundin GW, Wagemans J, Lavigne R, Jackson RW. Phage biocontrol to combat Pseudomonas syringae pathogens causing disease in cherry. Microbial Biotechnol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rafiq K, Akram MS, Shahid M, Qaisar U, Rashid N. Enhancement of salt tolerance in maize (Zea mays L.) using locally isolated Bacillus sp. SR-2–1/1. Biologia. 2020. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-020-00435-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman W, Prince M, Haque E, Sultana F, West HM, Rahman M, Mondol M, Akanda AM, Rahman M, Clarke ML. Endophytic Bacillus spp. from medicinal plants inhibit mycelial growth of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and promote plant growth. Zeitschrift Für Naturforschung C. 2018;73:247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajaofera MJN, Wang Y, Jatoi ZA, Jin P, Cui H, Lin C, Miao W. Bacillus atrophaeus HAB-5 secretion metabolites preventing occurrence of systemic diseases in tobacco plant. European J Plant Pathol. 2020;156:159–72.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rakshit A, Pal S, Parihar M, Singh H. Bioremediation of soils contaminated with Ni and Cd: an overview. In: Rakshit A, Abhilash P, Singh H, Ghosh S, editors. Adaptive soil management: from theory to practices. Springer: Singapore; 2017. p. 339–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramakrishna W, Yadav R, Li K. Plant growth promoting bacteria in agriculture: two sides of a coin. J Appl Soil Ecol. 2019;138:10–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramankutty N, Mehrabi Z, Waha K, Jarvis L, Kremen C, Herrero M, Rieseberg LH. Trends in global agricultural land use: implications for environmental health and food security. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2018;69:789–815.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rani B. Effect of arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi on biochemical parameters in wheat (Triticum aestivum L) under drought conditions. CCSHAU.2016.

  • Ravanbakhsh M, Sasidharan R, Voesenek LACJ, Kowalchuk GA, Jousset A. ACC deaminase-producing rhizosphere bacteria modulate plant responses to flooding. J of Ecol. 2017;105:979–86.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rich MK, Nouri E, Courty PE, Reinhardt D. Diet of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: bread and butter? Trends in Plant Sci. 2017;22:652–60.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rohani N, Daneshmand F, Vaziri A, Mahmoudi M, Saber-Mahani F. Growth and some physiological characteristics of Pistacia vera L. cv Ahmad Aghaei in response to cadmium stress and Glomus mosseae symbiosis. South African J Bot. 2019;124:499–507.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rouphael Y, Cardarelli M, Bonini P, Colla G. Synergistic action of a microbial-based biostimulant and a plant derived-protein hydrolysate enhances lettuce tolerance to alkalinity and salinity. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:131.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ruytinx J, Kafle A, Usman M, Coninx L, Zimmermann SD, Garcia K. Micronutrient transport in mycorrhizal symbiosis; zinc steals the show. Fungal Biol. 2020;34:1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rydlová J, Püschel D. Arbuscular mycorrhiza, but not hydrogel, alleviates drought stress of ornamental plants in peat-based substrate. Appl Soil Ecol. 2020;146: 103394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagar A, Rathore P, Ramteke PW, Ramakrishna W, Reddy MS, Pecoraro L. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and their synergistic interactions to counteract the negative effects of saline soil on agriculture: key macromolecules and mechanisms. Microorganisms. 2021;9:1491. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9071491.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez-Bel P, Troncho P, Gamir J, Pozo MJ, Camañes G, Cerezo M, Flors V. The nitrogen availability interferes with mycorrhiza-induced resistance against Botrytis cinerea in tomato. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:1598.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Santander C, Aroca R, Ruiz-Lozano JM, Olave J, Cartes P, Borie F, Cornejo P. Arbuscular mycorrhiza effects on plant performance under osmotic stress. Mycorrhiza. 2017;27:639–57.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar A, Pramanik K, Mitra S, Soren T, Maiti TK. Enhancement of growth and salt tolerance of rice seedlings by ACC deaminase producing Burkholderia sp. MTCC 12259. J Plant Physiol. 2018;231:434–42.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saxena B, Shukla K, Giri B. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and tolerance of salt stress in plants. In: Wu Q-S, editor. Arbuscular mycorrhizas and stress tolerance of plants. Singapore: Springer; 2017. p. 67–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scagel CF, Bryla DR, Lee J. Salt exclusion and mycorrhizal symbiosis increase tolerance to NaCl and CaCl2 salinity in ‘Siam Queen’basil. HortScience. 2017;52:278–87.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seymen M, Kurtar ES, Dursun A, Türkmen Ö. In sustainable agriculture: assessment of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in cucurbitaceous vegetable crops. In: Maheshwari D, Dheeman S, editors. Field crops: sustainable management by PGPR sustainable development and biodiversity, vol. 23. Springer: Cham; 2019. p. 69–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma S, Sharma AK, Prasad R, Varma A. Arbuscular mycorrhiza: a tool for enhancing crop production. In: Varma A, Prasad R, Tuteja N, editors. Mycorrhiza-nutrient uptake, biocontrol, ecorestoration. Cham: Springer; 2017. p. 235–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuqin J, Fang Z. Zero growth of chemical fertilizer and pesticide use: China’s objectives, progress and challenges. J Resources Ecol. 2018;9:50–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh I, Giri B. Arbuscular mycorrhiza mediated control of plant pathogens. In: Varma A, Prasad R, Tuteja N, editors. Mycorrhiza - nutrient Uptake, biocontrol, ecorestoration. Cham: Springer; 2017. p. 131–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh J, Singh P, Ray S, Rajput RS, Singh HB. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria: Benign and useful substitute for mitigation of biotic and abiotic stresses, plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for sustainable stress management. Singapore: Springer; 2019. p. 81–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith SE, Anderson IC, Smith FA. Mycorrhizal associations and phosphorus acquisition: from cells to ecosystems. Annual Plant Rev. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119312994.apr0529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stamford NP, Felix F, Oliveira W, Silva E, Carolina S, Arnaud T, Freitas AD. Interactive effectiveness of microbial fertilizer enriched in N on lettuce growth and on characteristics of an Ultisol of the rainforest region. Sci Hortic. 2019;247:242–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sun H, Fu J, Yang F. Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on switchgrass growth and mineral nutrition in cadmium-contaminated soil. Polish J Environ Studies. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1524/pjoes/94012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabassum B, Khan A, Tariq M, Ramzan M, Khan MSI, Shahid N, Aaliya K. Bottlenecks in commercialisation and future prospects of PGPR. Appl Soil Ecol. 2017;121:102–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarnabi ZM, Iranbakhsh A, Mehregan I, Ahmadvand R. Impact of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) on gene expression of some cell wall and membrane elements of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under water deficit using transcriptome analysis. Physiol Mol Biol of Plants. 2020;26:143–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teotia P, Kumar V, Kumar M, Shrivastava N, Varma A. Rhizosphere microbes: potassium solubilization and crop productivity—present and future aspects. In: Meena V, Maurya B, Verma J, Meena R, editors. Potassium solubilizing microorganisms for sustainable agriculture. New Delhi: Springer; 2016. p. 315–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thakur M, Bhattacharya S, Khosla PK, Puri S. Improving production of plant secondary metabolites through biotic and abiotic elicitation. J Appl Res Med Arom Plants. 2019;12:1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thirkell TJ, Charters MD, Elliott AJ, Sait SM, Field KJ. Are mycorrhizal fungi our sustainable saviours? Considerations for achieving food security. J Ecology. 2017;105:921–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tran BT, Watts-Williams SJ, Cavagnaro TR. Impact of an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus on the growth and nutrition of fifteen crop and pasture plant species. Funct Plant Biol. 2019;46:732–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trejo D, Barois I, Sangabriel-Conde W. Disturbance and land use effect on functional diversity of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Agrofor Systems. 2016;90:265–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma S, Singh A, Pradhan SS, Singh R, Singh J. Bio-efficacy of organic formulations on crop production-a review. Intern J Currr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2017;6:648–65.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vilela LAF, Barbosa MV. Contribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in promoting cadmium tolerance in plants’, cadmium tolerance in plants. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2019. p. 553–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villena J, Kitazawa H, Van Wees S, Pieterse CM, Takahashi H. Receptors and signaling pathways for recognition of bacteria in livestock and crops: prospects for beneficial microbes in healthy growth strategies. Front Immunol. 2018;9:2223.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Vishal B, Kumar P. Regulation of seed germination and abiotic stresses by gibberellins and abscisic acid. Front Plant Sci. 2018. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00838/full.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Volpe V, Chitarra W, Cascone P, Volpe MG, Bartolini P, Moneti G, Pieraccini G, Di Serio C, Maserti B, Guerrieri E. The association with two different arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi differently affects water stress tolerance in tomato. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:1480.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Watts-Williams SJ, Cavagnaro TR. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi increase grain Zinc concentration and modify the expression of root ZIP transporter genes in a modern barley (Hordeum vulgare) cultivar. Plant Sci. 2018;274:163–70.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Watts-Williams SJ, Cavagnaro TR, Tyerman SD. Variable effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal inoculation on physiological and molecular measures of root and stomatal conductance of diverse Medicago truncatula accessions. Plant Cell Environ. 2019;42:285–94.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu S, Zhang X, Huang L, Chen B. Arbuscular mycorrhiza and plant chromium tolerance. Soil Ecol Lett. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42832-019-0015-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Xu P, Han L, He J, Luo F, Zhang L. Research advance on molecular ecology of asymbiotic nitrogen fixation microbes. J Appl Ecol. 2017;28:3440–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yadav AN, Kumar R, Kumar S, Kumar V, Sugitha T, Singh B, Chauhan V, Dhaliwal HS, Saxena AK. Beneficial microbiomes: biodiversity and potential biotechnological applications for sustainable agriculture and human health. J Appl Biol Biotechnol. 2017;5:45–57.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang X, Li H, Jiang L, Tang X, Liu X, Zhang H. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi on the growth characteristics, root morphology, and ion distribution of Pyrus betulaefolia bunge under saline-akaline stress. Forest Sci. 2020;66:97–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yasmeen T, Tariq M, Iqbal S, Arif MS, Riaz M, Shahzad SM, Ali S, Noman M, Li T. Ameliorative capability of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) against salt stress in plant. In: Mirza H, Khalid RH, Kamrun N, Hesham FA, editors. Plant abiotic stress tolerance. Springer: Cham; 2019. p. 409–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhai Y, Shao Z, Cai M, Zheng L, Li G, Huang D, Cheng W, Thomashow LS, Weller DM, Yu Z. Multiple modes of nematode control by volatiles of Pseudomonas putida 1A00316 from Antarctic soil against Meloidogyne incognita’. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:253.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang F, Ge H, Zhang F, Guo N, Wang Y, Chen L, Ji X, Li C. Biocontrol Potential of Trichoderma harzianum Isolate T-aloe Against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in Soybean. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2016;100:64–74.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang YC, Wang P, Wu QH, Zou YN, Bao Q, Wu QS. Arbuscular mycorrhizas improve plant growth and soil structure in trifoliate orange under salt stress. Arch Agro Soil Sci. 2017;63:491–500.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang F, Wang P, Zou YN, Wu QS, Kuča K. Effects of mycorrhizal fungi on root-hair growth and hormone levels of taproot and lateral roots in trifoliate orange under drought stress. Arch Agro Soil Sci. 2019;65:1316–30.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou C, Ma Z, Zhu L, Xiao X, Xie Y, Zhu J. Rhizobacterial strain Bacillus megaterium BOFC15 induces cellular polyamine changes that improve plant growth and drought resistance. Intern J Mol Sci. 2016;17:976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zubair M, Hanif A, Farzand A, Sheikh TM, Khan AR, Suleman M. Genetic screening and expression analysis of psychrophilic Bacillus spp. reveal their potential to alleviate cold stress and modulate phytohormones in wheat. Microorganisms. 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7090337.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

OAF appreciates the National Research Foundation, South Africa, The World Academy of Science (NRF-TWAS) for (UID116095) PhD. stipend. OOB acknowledges the National Research Foundation (UID 123634 and UID132595) that supported research in her laboratory. TOA appreciates the collaboration and networking.

Funding

Open access funding provided by North-West University. National Research Foundation, South Africa, (UID 123634 and UID132595).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed equally.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olubukola Oluranti Babalola.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not Applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors approve the manuscript for publication.

Competing interests

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fasusi, O.A., Babalola, O.O. & Adejumo, T.O. Harnessing of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in agroecosystem sustainability. CABI Agric Biosci 4, 26 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43170-023-00168-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43170-023-00168-0

Keywords